Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Sir Richard Dalton on the Iranian Election Crisis and What's Next

Former UK Ambassador to Iran Sir Richard Dalton discusses the recent domestic turmoil in Iran and its implications for the future of the Islamic Republic.

Flynt Leverett and Kenneth Ballen Discuss the Iranian Presidential Election

Flynt Leverett and Kenneth Ballen analyze the results of a New America Foundation/Terror Free Tomorrow poll that found most Iranians support improved relations with the United States.

Sigmar Gabriel on the Major Economies Meetings on Energy Security and Climate Change

German Federal Minister for the Environment Sigmar Gabriel discusses what a post-Kyoto climate change regime might look like and the differences between the European and American positions.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page
The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

Wall Street Journal Spins Negative on Law of the Sea

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Saturday, Feb 23 2008, 9:50AM

CLOSE  
SOCIAL WEBSITES
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Newsvine
Stumble Upon
EMAIL THIS ARTICLE


Email addresses will not be stored

You'd expect it from the editorial page, but not from the WSJ news section.

The otherwise very interesting and solid piece on Alexandre Albuquerque, the Chairman of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, ends on this note:

"The Bush administration sought Senate approval of the treaty this year but that now appears unlikely, a senior U.S. State Department official said."
One problem: the senior U.S. State Department official interviewed for the article said no such thing.

In an e-mail, the official writes:

"I told the reporter that our official position was that we were very hopeful of getting the treaty through the Senate this year. Then he probed about obstacles in our way, like the election year, the strong lobbying efforts by opponents, the opposition by GOP candidates (there were more than one at the time), etc. His spin on my responses was a lot more negative than I expected."
My journalist friends remind me constantly how easy it is to take pot shots at reporters despite their good intentions. But if the State Department source is telling the truth -- and I have every reason to think s/he is -- then the assertion that the s/he believes Senate approval is unlikely has no basis in fact. And knowing this individual and his/her outlook on the Convention's prospects, I also happen to know that it is wrong. The Convention effort is still moving forward with a full head of steam.

-- Scott Paul

« Previous Article - Hillary Clinton's Future: Senate Majority Leader?
» Next Article - Media Alert: K-Rock Magazine with Bob Salter on Castro and the Future of US-Cuba Relations

Reader Comments (3) - post a comment

Posted by Joe Klein's conscience, Feb 23 2008, 1:44PM - Link

You'd expect it from the editorial page, but not from the WSJ news section.


Hasn't Rupert taken over the WSJ? If so, why wouldn't we see that kind of nonsense on the news pages?

Posted by bellgong, Feb 24 2008, 3:12AM - Link

This is just a little lame duck meta spin "insight" layered on a piece due for deadline. Errors and reporting are like crackers and cheese, they just go together.
:)

Posted by rolex watch, May 20 2009, 9:18AM - Link

If you put together or involved with any events in the NYC area--and have a couple extra seats for thoughtful participants, as you recently & occasionally mention--give us a heads up.

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2009 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.