Using PayPal
TPM Cafe Launch Tomorrow: Tallulah Bankhead and the Pursuit of a "Win"
Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Monday, May 30 2005, 11:57AM
There is a great stable of folks who have joined up as coffee house chatterers on Josh Marshall's new venture, TPM Cafe. I'm one of the cuprits.
The new site will be up for public access tomorrow -- but we are already debating one another over religion, John Bolton, political tactics, and whatever we get wound up about.
Here is a piece I posted yesterday but wanted to share here as well:
TPMCafe.com, 29 March 2005Declaring Victory No Matter Whether One is Winning or Losing
by Steve Clemons
I am in Chestertown, Maryland this weekend and while driving down lots of old corn and tobacco plantation roads looking for a dock where friends were tinkering with a tiny sailboat, I discovered St. Paul's Church and its old cemetery.
Tallulah Bankhead is buried there, and I paid my respects. She was a great star from the past, flamboyant about her sexual escapades, ready to take on any bland convention and provoke some memorable conflagration over it. Her grandfather and dad were Senators, and she had politics on her mind and in her blood.
My hunch is that if Tallulah were around today, we'd be working together to try and undo George Bush's wannabe monarchy. She'd be bold -- declaring victory in the worst of odds. She'd stand in stark contrast to many of the leading progressive pundits and pols today who seem genetically predisposed to conceding defeat before the battle had even started.
This has been the case in the battle over John Bolton's nomination to the U.N. which I have been leading part of the charge against at my blog, The Washington Note.
Senator Richard Durbin, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, comedian and political strategist James Carville, and several high placed "off the record" commentators in Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid's office have all stated at various times in the process that John Bolton would get confirmed. But that was about five iterations back in the process -- and since, Durbin has retracted his statement, Richardson recommended that I "stop biting" my friends but still stepped back from what he said, and others have watched in awe as Democrats and Republicans with a conscience have turned the supposedly "slam-dunk" Bolton nomination into the story that won't stop giving.
Unless the White House concedes to Senator Biden, Dodd, and others who have made "evidence requests" of the administration regarding Bolton, his nomination will remain in limbo. Very few imagined such an outcome would be possible. Most thought Bolton was an obscure bureaucrat pursuing a job few Americans cared about.
John Bolton has now become a household name -- and people do seem to think that the U.S. should be sending someone to the U.N. who has imeccable credentials and of whom Americans can feel proud. That is not John Bolton.
Dems need to wake up. The brilliance of the first four years of the Bush White House is that Bush and Rove behaved as if they had won the contested and close election with an 80% mandate. Democrats collapsed.
It's time to turn the tables. Democrats -- and moderate Republicans frankly -- need to start working on their atrophied muscles of political activism and "push back" and begin competing not just for control of the political process but also over the ideas and vision that will drive the nation forward.
It's time to be tenacious and stop yielding to Republicans, who have been all too good at declaring victory even when they are losing -- while too many Dems believe their line.
So, tomorrow -- check out TPM Cafe.
-- Steve Clemons
« Previous Article - The Feingold Standard When Rejecting Nominations: Bolton Surpasses What it Takes to Get Feingold "Nay"» Next Article - How Far Should Senators Go on Bolton Documents Filibuster?
I agree. But,to this point it has been like spitting into the wind. It is obvious that "starve the beast" is an economic program by the GOP to roll back social programs of FDR, so why do so many dems in the house and senate vote $490 billion for pentagon corporate welfare and to burn over $300 billion in Iraq. Confusing aint it?
I agree, too, though I believe there are those who are doing more than refusing to yield, but are also fighting an all-out war to protect Constitutional ideas in quiet, only occasionally glimpsed ways.
Steve, I have a question. I've lost sight of Matthew Freedman as an issue in all this. Are documents regarding his client list and State Department duties still among those still being demanded before the Senate will vote to confirm? I for one keep wondering what he's really about. But then, like one of the commenters on an earlier post, I'm one of those who wonders why we let Marcos bilk his nation for billions and where all that loot has gone now . . .
Steve -
I think that more and more the themes on this blog revolve around the question of integrity in government and adherence to the norms that enabled the U.S. to evolve in its very special way.
Because of this I think it would be enormously stimulating if there could be a continuing open thread on this topic.
Thanks,
sending someone to the U.N. who has im[p]eccable credentials and of whom Americans can feel proud. That is not John Bolton.
News flash: it ain't neocon and climate-change-denier Paula Dobriansky, either.
I would like to know,why they buried Tahullah Bankhead in Chestertown Maryland?
Hope you can answer this for me
Thank you
Charlotte
I would like to know,why they buried Tahullah Bankhead in Chestertown Maryland?
Hope you can answer this for me
Thank you
Charlotte




Reader Comments (6) - post a comment