RSS
Using PayPal
Doug Bandow: Time to Acknowledge Consequences of Iraq
Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Sunday, Jul 31 2005, 1:30PM
It's good news that British authorities apparently have nabbed the four men who launched the most recent (unsuccessful) bombings in London. But the threat of terrorism will go on. And security professionals, in contrast to politicians, acknowledge how the Iraq conflict is encouraging additional violent attacks. Evidence of the connection keeps accumulating.
According to the Times in London:
IRAQ has become "a dominant issue" for Islamic extremists in Britain, MI5 has admitted.Obviously, this analysis doesn't mean terrorism is justified. (One shouldn't have to say that, but with war advocates apt to take the slightest sign of opposition as objective support for the terrorists, it must be said.) This doesn't mean that terrorists don't articulate other grievances. This doesn't even mean one can't justify the Iraq war. But one needs to acknowledge the consequences of the conflict and honestly balance its costs and benefits.In a fresh analysis of the threat facing Britain from international terrorist groups, the acknowledgement underlines the view of the security and intelligence services that Iraq has provided an extra motivating force for terrorists.
Contributing to the agency's official website after the July 7 bombings, under the heading "Threat to the UK from international terrorism", a team of MI5 analysts concludes: "Though they have a range of aspirations and 'causes', Iraq is a dominant issue for a range of extremist groups and individuals in the UK and Europe."
After the suicide bombings in London, Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, said there was no connection between them and the war in Iraq. This conflicted with a leaked assessment by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre, based at MI5 and run by a Ministry of Defence official, which claimed, three weeks before July 7 that Iraq was continuing to act "as a focus of a range of terrorist related activities in Britain".
The latest MI5 assessment sticks to the view that there is a link between Iraq and terrorist activities. In their website analysis, the MI5 officers add: "Some individuals who support the insurgency are known to have travelled to Iraq in order to fight against coalition forces. It is possible that they may return to the UK and consider mounting attacks here."
So when the President's argues that Iraq has become the central front in the war on terrorism, he is right. But only because of his own policies, most obviously the ill-considered decision to invade Iraq. In saying that we now must remain there, the President is like the man who murders his parents and then requests the court's mercy since he's an orphan.
-- Doug Bandow
« Previous Article - Doug Bandow: Recruiting Problems Should Create Cause for Reflection» Next Article - Charles Kupchan: On the Road to Normalcy at State?
What the Brits are doing makes sense. They are rolling up the bad guys and busting their cells. Compare that to the "Headless chicken" response of the US that gave us the Patriot Act, hundreds of non-terrorist arrests, and orange duct tape. Osama bin Forgotten is still on the loose, Zarqawi is rampaging in Iraq, the anthrax attacks are still unsolved and swept under the rug, we are wasting billions every day in Iraq and CBS tells me that the good news is we have built several hundred schools. The bad news is that electricity is worse than before the war, less oil is being pumped, Iraq is nowhere near paying for itself as BushCo promised and security is eating away at the money for reconstruction that hasn't already been stolen by crooked American contractors.
One can only conclude that Bush is running the most incompetent administration in recent history. I did not think we would ever have a president worse than Buchannon, but Bush may have achieved that milestone.
Reader Comments (2) - post a comment