Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Steve Clemons interviews Eli Pariser

Former Executive Director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser discusses his new book "The Filter Bubble" and how the architecture of the internet is evolving to match our interests and filtering out information that might challenge our opinions.

Steve Clemons on Obama's Approach to Libya

Steve Clemons argues that in addittion to being ineffectual militarily, a no-fly zone will change the narrative of the Libyan uprising and shift the focus from the decisions of the Libyan rebels to the actions of Western nations.

Ian Bremmer On the War Between States and Corporations

Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer discusses the political and economic impacts of the economic recession, as well as rising economic powers.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page

The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

Unanswered Questions to John Bolton: SOLVED

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Sunday, Mar 26 2006, 6:39PM

boltonwatch.jpg

Last Thursday morning, I sent a couple of questions to the "Ask the State Department" site that was planning an online session with John Bolton.

I sent two questions, clearly identified myself, received confirmations from the State Department that my queries of Ambassador Bolton were received. Just to post them again:

1. Ambassador Bolton, why when you were Chair of the U.N. Security Council or during any other part of your tenure have you failed to pursue what happened to the $9 billion that passed from UN hands to the Coalition Provisional Authority? You speak a great deal about the need for reform, transparency, and honest governance. What happened to this money? And why don't you seem to care?

2. Ambassador Bolton, how do you feel about Under Secretaty of State Nicholas Burns? Are you on the same page on Iran? He says that we need to give diplomacy time to work on Iran and not recklessly shake the fragile opportunity that may exist with Iran. You say that we have to ram through an agreement. . .yesterday. Are you working at cross-purposes? Or is this a good cop/bad cop thing? Or is there another explanation?

I think that these were pretty polite questions, particularly the first.

If you read the transcript of carefully crafted blandness in Bolton's responses during his on-line forum, there is no reference to the questions I posted early.

That's OK. They can't answer everyone -- and I felt that I was just accidentally ignored -- UNTIL I got this email.

This is the response received to my second question:

We have not heard from you concerning your request for support in the 48 hours since we sent you a response. Consequently, we have changed the status of your question to SOLVED.


Question Reference #060323-000121

---------------------------------------------------------------

Summary: Relationship with R. Nicholas Burns -- Iran Diplomacy

Category Level 1: Ask the State Department

Date Created: 03/23/2006 08:27 AM

Last Updated: 03/26/2006 01:49 AM

Status: Solved

Discussion Thread

---------------------------------------------------------------

Customer - 03/23/2006 08:27 AM

Ambassador Bolton, How do you feel about Nick Burns? Are you on the same page on Iran? He says that we need to give diplomacy time to work on Iran and not recklessly shake the fragile opportunity that may exist with Iran. You say that we have to ram through an agreement. . .yesterday. Are you working at cross-purposes? Or is this a good cop/bad cop thing? Or is there another explanation?

[---001:000825:09289---]

I'm posting this mostly for the humor of it. I only received a confirmation that State had received my query for Bolton and then heard nothing more.

I guess to get a response I should have posted the question a couple of times to them, keeping it alive during their 48 hour window.

Nonetheless, I have no idea if Ambassador Bolton saw my questions.

Now that I've posted them here, however, I have confidence he will see them.

What did happen to that $9 billion of UN managed money that flowed through U.S. controlled coffers?

-- Steve Clemons

« Previous Article - See "V for Vendetta"
» Next Article - Solving Hard Problems: Albright's "Iran Action Plan"

Reader Comments (5) - post a comment

Posted by steambomb, Mar 27 2006, 1:21AM - Link

I wanted to ask him how long a recess appointment lasts.

Posted by wfeather, Mar 27 2006, 12:24PM - Link

A recess appointment lasts as long as the unitary executive desires it to last. Elections, too, are held at the pleasure of the unitary executive.

Seriously, do you see any evidence that the current administration has any plans to give up all the power it's accruing?

Posted by Nell, Mar 27 2006, 1:23PM - Link

steambomb, if you're really asking, the answer is that Bolton's appointment lasts until the next Congress is sworn in: January 2007. The administration must nominate someone who will be confirmed, or not, by the new Senate (which I sincerely hope will have a Democratic majority by then).

Posted by erichwwk, Mar 27 2006, 2:01PM - Link

And since you believe Bolton will see questions here:

How are we doing in resolving the liability issue holding up the elimination of about 70 tons of weapon grade plutonium? Are you keeping Senator Domenici posted on progress?

Posted by liz, Mar 27 2006, 5:42PM - Link

Yes you should have asked him eight times. It takes eight times to get a letter to an Administrative Law Judge in South Carolina ( I think... I am still waiting to see... Ups says they delivered all eight of em ).... so eight or nine or ten times. Our government cannot and does not function like any other business on earth.

The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2012 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.