Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Steve Clemons interviews Eli Pariser

Former Executive Director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser discusses his new book "The Filter Bubble" and how the architecture of the internet is evolving to match our interests and filtering out information that might challenge our opinions.

Steve Clemons on Obama's Approach to Libya

Steve Clemons argues that in addittion to being ineffectual militarily, a no-fly zone will change the narrative of the Libyan uprising and shift the focus from the decisions of the Libyan rebels to the actions of Western nations.

Ian Bremmer On the War Between States and Corporations

Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer discusses the political and economic impacts of the economic recession, as well as rising economic powers.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page

The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

President Bush to Speak at 5:45 pm

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Tuesday, Mar 20 2007, 3:45PM

No one knows the subject -- but it must be the Gonzales affair -- unless perhaps they have captured bin Laden or al-Zawahiri?

The White House offer for Rove and Miers to testify in the GonzoGate matter may be for commentary NOT under oath, which is not such a great deal. Leahy should not accept such an offer.

More soon.

-- Steve Clemons



« Previous Article - Bush Says Rove and Miers Can Testify in Attorney Firing Hearings
» Next Article - Cuba Diaries

Reader Comments (22) - post a comment

Posted by Matthew, Mar 20 2007, 4:07PM - Link

Wake me when it's over. I stopped watching the Prez when he embarrassed the Universe with his "Axis of Evil" speech.

Posted by ROger, Mar 20 2007, 4:38PM - Link

GonzoGate. Perfect.

Posted by Mackie, Mar 20 2007, 4:39PM - Link

"Commentary NOT under oath"

What a load.

Posted by Punchy, Mar 20 2007, 5:24PM - Link

Mr. Clemons, what's being reported is much worse than "not under oath". Apparently, there can be NO transcript of the conversation taken.

So, not only can they lie, they can lie with no one writing anything about their lies down on paper or tape. And of course, when shown to be liars, they'd just say "prove I ever said that".

I just cannot fathom the arrogance of this White House to so f#ck the legislative branch as if they hold no powers and no moxie. Isn't this the equivalent to a child giving his parents the middle finger? Who accepts this shit?


Posted by JL, Mar 20 2007, 5:40PM - Link

Steve, The real news of the day should be that Bush can still use the news media for his advantage. The first line will be that the Dems are on a witch hunt. Of course the news should be about the documents and the e-mails they refuse to release.

Posted by Emily, Mar 20 2007, 5:42PM - Link

Apparently, the White House will permit Rove & Miers to testify about this US Attorney purge, on the condition that their testimony is not taken under oath and it is not made public and that no transcript can be taken!

What is the matter with the American people, that they do not see the contempt with which they are held by this Mad King George, this arrogant & stupid little dictator?

What does Bush have to do before Congress gets the back-bone to impeach this criminal Bush?

What will it take before this nation recognizes that Bush & Co. thumb-their-noses at the U.S. Constitution & Bill of Rights?

--- Does anyone really think that Bush's latest ploy to protect his criminal consiglieres Gonzales & Rove from prosecution by such insane demands, isn't designed simply to permit them to LIE WITH IMPUNITY???

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove & Gonzales are CRIMINALS WHO SHOULD BE IN JAIL-- AND NOT ABUSING SUCH VAST POWER!!!

Posted by Renee, Mar 20 2007, 5:47PM - Link

We can only hope that Senator Leahy and other patriotic congress-persons reject in no uncertain terms the White House's laughable terms for "letting" [sic] Rove and Miers testify.

Remind me why Rove still has security clearance, having committed treason by leaking information (i.e. Valerie Plame's identity) which has undermined our national security.

I am listening to Bush now, and he is clearly a liar. Bush does indeed need to be impeached. He's a crook.

Posted by John, Mar 20 2007, 6:13PM - Link

BUSH'S BOTTOM-LINE:

'Karl and Harriet can testify so long as they can lie.

I can do whatever I want because I am president.

Congress better not mess with me or else...'

WHAT WILL LEAHY DO?

WILL THE DEMS BE INTIMIDATED INTO COWERING WITH FEAR?

THAT'S WHAT BUSH BETS-ON!

Posted by Carroll, Mar 20 2007, 6:22PM - Link

Hummm..Bush's speech seemed to be a "bring it on" to congress...even if he did have trouble reading it at times. He seems to have no trouble though in his speaking when he gets to the bellicose parts where he threatens people.

Interesting thing someone pointed out in the emails was Harriet mailing someone at the
DOJ that "this' didn't need to be brought to the boss's "attention". I assume she meant Bush. Do you suppose Bush has a glimmer of half the things that go on in his adm? I know you can have vocabulary and speech issues and still not be stupid, but I have never felt Bush was even middling bright or interested in his actual job as President.

Maybe "slacker' is the best description of Bush.

Posted by Marcia, Mar 20 2007, 6:32PM - Link

The Dems should not send those subpoenas by carrier pidgeon. Schumer is in the mix so any compromission is possible. He is already talking about "conversations." Anything to keep the doors closed.

The emails, probably intended to impress by the number, and so conveniently dumped are a smoke screen. It seems that Gonzales does not use email and that Rove uses an outside connection so by dropping confetti they are playing for time.
Leahy, Conyers and Waxman are the only ones with any backbone.

On Iraq the Dems are ready to do anything to avoid having a vote on record so have stripped their motion down to jello. What a great day for Pelosi.

Posted by M, Mar 20 2007, 6:42PM - Link

Bush should have been a cowboy instead of president. One only has to see what his cowboy tactics and drunkardly swagger have done to our Republic and to the people of Iraq too. Neither country has a government which protects its' own people.

Bush better watch-out because even Republicans might dare to call his bluff one of these days. Then what would Bush do without his "Brain" Rove?

In the meantime, I hope this Congress subpeonas Rove, Miers and Gonzales. If they are found to have lied in US Attorney-gate then shouldn't they be charged with contempt before Congress?

Congress ought to show Bush that our nation doesn't want a king.

Posted by Marcia, Mar 20 2007, 6:50PM - Link

"Bush better watch-out because even Republicans might dare to call his bluff one of these days. Then what would Bush do without his "Brain" Rove?"

The Dems might do well to watch-out as well. If Republicans call Bush's bluff Dems might be left standing at the bus stop in line behind Clinton, Emanuel and Lieberman screaming that someone stole their issues.

Posted by Jim, Mar 20 2007, 8:07PM - Link

Yo Steve: Did you notice your independent principled hero Hagel was one of two Senators to vote to maintain the lack of congressional oversight on US Atty appointments today? That halo looking at all tarnished to you yet?

Posted by ..., Mar 20 2007, 8:29PM - Link

JL quote >>Steve, The real news of the day should be that Bush can still use the news media for his advantage.<< the real news for a long time has been - the bush agenda and the media agenda are much the same... the media has an agenda is unwilling to be neutral- it has taken sides with bush for a long time now.. anyone who works in the media and doesn't goose step accordingly will be ostracized.. washington post is a good case in point. they had a reputation which they have successfully ruined over the last 5 years.

Posted by Diane, Mar 20 2007, 9:15PM - Link

Hey Steve,
I know you like Chuck Hagel, and I often do too. So why did he vote against the Feinstein bill today? The vote to amend that part of the Patriot Act that allows the Admin to appoint USA without Senate approval.....why did Hagel vote against this??? I see I'm not the only one asking about this, I'm not trying to put you on the spot, I usually like Hagel so I don't get this vote.

Posted by DonS, Mar 20 2007, 9:17PM - Link

I just watched a rerun. Lest we miss the forrest for the trees, Bush is so emotionally out of control it is palpable, his physical posture, gestures and voice betraying all. I saw no connection between the puppet emotionally reacting and any rational brain. He is and has always been a joke, a disgrace, a sham, and a bully. The emperor has no clothes. None.

Posted by Pissed Off American, Mar 20 2007, 11:13PM - Link

Apparently, Gonzales ALREADY lied to Congress. Remember his testimony during his confirmation hearings about his role in getting Bush recused from jury duty? I don't understand just what the hell Congress, or the American people, expected from this slimey lying crook. Its no secret he lied during his confirmation hearings. Its no secret he was Bush's attorney. Did they expect the piece of shit to grow some integrity because they confirmed him into the most powerful legal seat in the land?

This whole God damned circus gets more surreal by the minute. They give the FBI unprecedented power via the Patriot Act, and they're SUPRISED that power was abused??? Good God, a passle of cops abused their power, gee, who woulda thunk it? They confirm an apparent liar into the Attorney General's seat, and they are suprised he lies?

And while we are on the subject of surreal, Bush would veto any bill that says troops sent to Iraq must be adequately trained, adequately equipped, and adequately rested? Gee, what an unreasonable set of demands, eh?

And now these two slithering lizards, Miers and Gonzales, are going to testify, BUT NOT UNDER OATH??? I'm tellin' ya, these people, from Bush on down, belong in a federal prison and if these pathetic cowards in Congress don't put them there, than our "Democracy" is a lie.

Posted by Ticia, Mar 21 2007, 12:06AM - Link
Posted by Ticia, Mar 21 2007, 12:08AM - Link
Posted by Neal, Mar 21 2007, 9:38AM - Link

Any attempt to hold the Bush administration accountable endangers the security of America. Do you still think there will be an election in 2008?

Posted by David N, Mar 21 2007, 3:31PM - Link

Glad to see so many coming on board.

Now for the rest of the country.

Remember Bush's vocabulary includes the following:

Bipartisan: My way.

Partisan: The highway.

Only thus can we understand what he's talking about.

Posted by Donald, Mar 21 2007, 4:07PM - Link

Why aren't Bush and Gonzales under indictment for abuse of power?

After all, the provision in the Patriot Act which allows them to appoint US Attorney Generals without obtaining senatorial approval was intended to be used in emergency situations. Instead, Bush and Gonzales (as usual) cynically exploited this provision for their own corrupt political purposes!

It is time to impeach Bush and the whole lot of traitors in his crime organization. The neo-cons have ruined this country (and that includes Cheney, Rice, Rove, Abrams and the rest.)

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2010 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.
En ligne pas cher tadalafil 20mg acheter cialis sans ordonnance en France les informations relatives au mode d'action et les effets secondaires. Le jeu en ligne est devenu une industrie millions de dollars avec des joueurs de partout dans le monde des paris sur les jeux de casino en ligne. La gamme exclusive de jeux de casino soutenu par caractéristiques exceptionnelles et des avantages a surpassé le glamour de casinos terrestres. Même les gens qui n'ont jamais été à un casino sur terre, ou joué tout jeu de casino jamais, deviennent attirés par le monde exceptionnel de jeux en ligne. Vous pourriez vous demander ce qui rend le jeu en ligne si populaire, quand il n'y a pas de concessionnaire réel, pas de vraie foule, pas de serveuses glamour et pas de boissons gratuites. Ci-dessous sont cinq raisons fondamentales pour lesquelles un grand nombre de joueurs de casino se dirigent vers les casino en ligne aujourd'hui. Le Casino en ligne contient également un certain nombre de formateurs de jeu pour les jeux les plus populaires de casino en ligne! Vous pouvez jouer gratuitement ici sur le site et recevoir des conseils de stratégie de l'entraîneur sur le chemin. Notre dévotion au jeu en ligne nous met en mesure de vous proposer les meilleures affaires en bonus avec les meilleurs casinos en ligne. Cela signifie plus d'argent dans votre poche. Restez branchés pour les bonus de casino plus rentables et les promotions à venir.