Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Sir Christopher Meyer on the West's Strategic Confusion

Former UK Ambassador to the United States and author of 'Getting OUr Way: 500 Years of Adventure and Intrigue: the Inside Story of British Diplomacy' discusses the lessons of history and America's wars.

Daniel Yergin on the Future of Global Energy

Cambridge Research Energy Associates Chairman and Pullitzer-Prize winning author Daniel Yergin discusses the prospects for renewable energy, the oil politics of the Middle East and the future of the hydrocarbon economy.

Jim Locher on Reforming the United States' National Security Architecture

Project on National Security Reform President & CEO Jim Locher discusses how to reform the national security council to focus more on long-term strategic thinking.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page
The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

Flip-Flop Alert: Senators Suddenly on the Fence

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Friday, Oct 26 2007, 9:45AM

Sens. John Sununu, Norm Coleman, and George Voinovich all voted for the Law of the Sea in 2004. According to sources in the Senate, all are now reconsidering their votes under heavy pressure from the likes of John Bolton, Frank Gaffney, and their most vocal black helicopter-fearing constituents. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will vote on the convention next week.

If you want to learn more about these opponents, by the way, read Elena Schor's news analysis piece in the Guardian, published yesterday.

The Law of the Sea convention should be a no-brainer. What's more, it should be an opportunity for moderate and old-school conservative Republicans to slam down those in their party who think that the threat of force alone can advance U.S. interests. The votes are still there to pass it on the floor, but now it is becoming a real fight.

These three senators, in particular, need to understand that there are consequences for so transparently choosing politics over principle. Men and women in the Navy and Coast Guard, shipbuilders, fishermen, and others are counting on them to do the right thing. I still think they each will -- but the fact that they are even on the fence speaks to how deeply misinformation about the treaty is taking hold.

It's time for progressives to stand up. We've complied with the treaty's rules since President Reagan insisted that we do so 25 years ago. Joining entails zero sacrifice.

At some point, we'll actually care about working internationally that entails some measure of give-and-take, be it on climate change, nuclear diplomacy, or something else. If we let John Bolton and Frank Gaffney dictate the Senate's foreign policy on this one, we won't be able to stop them on the next one.

Yes, this is a rant, but I'm not apologizing. Call senators now.

-- Scott Paul

Update: Matt Stoller and Taylor Marsh weigh in.

« Previous Article - Republican Senate Leadership to Fight Law of the Sea
» Next Article - Making the Desert Bloom

Reader Comments (2) - post a comment

Posted by Robert Morrow, Oct 26 2007, 11:04PM - Link

The United Nations is not competent or qualified to fly black helicoptors, much less be in charge of all the world's oceans so that they will then have a backdoor way to TAX the world with fees, royalties as an unelected burueacracy doles out fishing, drilling and mining rights.
The problem with the one-world government crowd is that it is all about "government" not "democracy" or "republicanism."
You've got to be kidding me. You expect us to think a corrupt, unelected, undemocratic, unaccountable bureaucrcy - anti-American to boot - is going to "protect" the USA and its citizens. Hell no I don't think it will. Of course, I expect my United States of America military to protect my and other US citizens. Again, who in the hell elected the UN? Answer: no one and that is the problem with that rathole. Don't expect Americans anytime soon to be running to that organization; hopefully never.

Posted by Lurch, Oct 27 2007, 1:26AM - Link

"...You've got to be kidding me. You expect us to think a corrupt, unelected, undemocratic, unaccountable bureaucrcy - anti-American to boot - is going to "protect" the USA and its citizens. Hell no I don't think it will..."

Umm. and that would be different from what we have right now in what way?

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2009 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.