Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Steve Clemons interviews Eli Pariser

Former Executive Director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser discusses his new book "The Filter Bubble" and how the architecture of the internet is evolving to match our interests and filtering out information that might challenge our opinions.

Steve Clemons on Obama's Approach to Libya

Steve Clemons argues that in addittion to being ineffectual militarily, a no-fly zone will change the narrative of the Libyan uprising and shift the focus from the decisions of the Libyan rebels to the actions of Western nations.

Ian Bremmer On the War Between States and Corporations

Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer discusses the political and economic impacts of the economic recession, as well as rising economic powers.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page

The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

Making the Desert Bloom

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Friday, Oct 26 2007, 11:15AM

desert_empty_quarter.jpg

An underreported story that is finally getting some ink in the US mainstream press is the redirection of Saudi Arabia's oil wealth to new, dare I say progressive, ventures. Most pundits are racing to catch up with the latest intellectual fads by decrying the "oil curse" that few have time to contemplate how the latest oil boom might actually provide the conditions for a new positive direction in Saudi Arabia.

But that is what appears to be happening according to the dean of a Saudi women's college quoted in today's cover article in the New York Times:

Suhair el-Qurashi, dean of the private all-female Dar Al Hekma College, often attacked as "bad" and "liberal," said a vigorous example of free-thinking at the university would embolden the many Saudis who back the king's quest to reform long-stagnant higher education.

"The king knows he will face some backlash and bad publicity," Ms. Qurashi said. "I think the system is moving in the right direction."

The story describes the efforts of King Abdullah to build a modern, state-of-the-art graduate university that would open its doors to foreign students as well as Saudi nationals:

On a marshy peninsula 50 miles from this Red Sea port, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia is staking $12.5 billion on a gargantuan bid to catch up with the West in science and technology. Between an oil refinery and the sea, the monarch is building from scratch a graduate research institution that will have one of the 10 largest endowments in the world, worth more than $10 billion.

Its planners say men and women will study side by side in an enclave walled off from the rest of Saudi society, the country's notorious religious police will be barred and all religious and ethnic groups will be welcome in a push for academic freedom and international collaboration sure to test the kingdom's cultural and religious limits.

This undertaking is directly at odds with the kingdom's religious establishment, which severely limits women's rights and rejects coeducation and robust liberal inquiry as unthinkable.

For the new institution, the king has cut his own education ministry out the loop, hiring the state-owned oil giant Saudi Aramco to build the campus, create its curriculum and attract foreigners.

Supporters of what is to be called the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, or Kaust, wonder whether the king is simply building another gated island to be dominated by foreigners, like the compounds for oil industry workers that have existed here for decades, or creating an institution that will have a real impact on Saudi society and the rest of the Arab world.

"There are two Saudi Arabias," said Jamal Khashoggi, the editor of Al Watan, a newspaper. "The question is which Saudi Arabia will take over."

The king has broken taboos, declaring that the Arabs have fallen critically behind much of the modern world in intellectual achievement and that his country depends too much on oil and not enough on creating wealth through innovation.

Viewed in isolation, the story may read as a quaint anomaly -- a King trying to make a desert bloom, guided by the adage "If you build it, they will come".

But it is one data point in a series of micro-trends, a number of which I wrote about here, that includes fiscal and economic reform with accession into the WTO, heavy domestic investment in seven new economic cities to diversify the country's nodes of power, the allocation of one-third of government jobs to women (on national economy grounds), a creation of space for critical public dialogue on governance, and veiled challenges to the religious establishment to gradual move them back into their corner. These are not easy efforts and they come in baby steps.

Do not hold your breath for a modernization "takeoff" as Walt Rostow formulated, but the days of a seemingly inert Saudi government are over. A colleague of mine once remarked that most analysts look at Saudi Arabia like an economist lamenting a recession in Silicon Valley in 1995, just before the dot-com boom. Examining the past two years will reveal a subtle fact: Saudi Arabia is on the move.

--Sameer Lalwani



« Previous Article - Flip-Flop Alert: Senators Suddenly on the Fence
» Next Article - Bhutto and Musharraf, Feuding Again

Reader Comments (4) - post a comment

Posted by JohnH, Oct 26 2007, 4:09PM - Link

This would appear to be good news despite its unfortunate title. I thought that the phrase "making the desert bloom" was reserved by those other descendents of Abraham. What will AIPAC say? Won't they feel threatened if others can make the desert bloom, too?

Posted by Carroll, Oct 26 2007, 4:36PM - Link

Speaking of the people that made the desert bloom on someone elses land with someone elses water and piles of someone elses money....we have a new twist in the Isr-Pal yada,yada.:


Scott MacLeod of Time Magazine
October 25, 2007 1:08

Rice's Fear of the One-State Solution

Most of the mainstream press missed it, and her own website doesn't mention it either, but Condi Rice dropped something of a bomb-shell during her testimony on the Middle East to the House Foreign Affairs Committee. (video)

The main substance of her prepared remarks on the upcoming Annapolis peace conference reflected significant support for the Palestinian side. In language that seemed a little blunter than usual, she stated categorically, "Israel must stop settlement expansion and remove unauthorized outposts." Palestinian leader Abbas and Arab diplomats have been complaining that Israel's settlement policy essentially is a sign of bad faith going into the peace conference.

The bombshell came in the Q&A afterwards, when she warned that time was running out to negotiate a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


Our concern is growing that without a serious political prospect for the Palestinians that gives to moderate leaders a horizon that they can show to their people that indeed there is a two-state solution that is possible, we will lose the window for a two-state solution.

The comment coming from the top American diplomat is important. It seemed to be both a sober American appraisal of the dire state of the peace process and a warning to Israel that it will have a profound problem on its hands down the road if it doesn't seize the opportunity to make a deal with Abbas now.

Rice is basically warning that trends may be moving in favor of Hamas, the prime advocate of a one-state solution to the problem. Israel will not accept signing its own death warrant to accomodate Hamas's demand for one Arab Muslim state, of course. But another implication that can be read into Rice's comment is that when the window for a two-state solution is closed, Israel will be faced with a demographic time tomb that threatens a Muslim majority within the land it controls. At that point, Israel would face a fateful conundrum: allow a democratic majority to rule, which would threaten Israel's existence through the ballot box, or establish an unviable apartheid system thay would bring international isolation and probably collapse.

--By Scott MacLeod/Dubai
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I hesitate to guess what this means. Hopefully it is a veiled threat to Israel to get serious or else. Maybe Bush is desperate for success on the Isr-Pal situtation, looking for anything he can point to as having accomplished during his reign of terror. He should know he can't talk to terriers like Israel, just go ahead and slap some sanctions and bombs on them Georgie. Isn't that our policy with countries that don't do what we tell them?

Posted by JohnH, Oct 26 2007, 5:39PM - Link

"Most of the mainstream press missed it, and her own website doesn't mention it either..." Possibly because whatever Condi says or does is totally inconsequential. I can't imagine why anyone is coming to Anapolis other than to shop in Washington and New York. At least Condi can provide valuable assistance in that endeavor.

Sad to say, but Condi is unlikely to merit even a footnote in the pages of history.

Posted by JohnH, Oct 29 2007, 3:16PM - Link

I guess I wrote off the Anapolis summit too soon. It could accomplish something in a perverse sort of way:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/917818.html

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2010 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.
En ligne pas cher tadalafil 20mg acheter cialis sans ordonnance en France les informations relatives au mode d'action et les effets secondaires. Le jeu en ligne est devenu une industrie millions de dollars avec des joueurs de partout dans le monde des paris sur les jeux de casino en ligne. La gamme exclusive de jeux de casino soutenu par caractéristiques exceptionnelles et des avantages a surpassé le glamour de casinos terrestres. Même les gens qui n'ont jamais été à un casino sur terre, ou joué tout jeu de casino jamais, deviennent attirés par le monde exceptionnel de jeux en ligne. Vous pourriez vous demander ce qui rend le jeu en ligne si populaire, quand il n'y a pas de concessionnaire réel, pas de vraie foule, pas de serveuses glamour et pas de boissons gratuites. Ci-dessous sont cinq raisons fondamentales pour lesquelles un grand nombre de joueurs de casino se dirigent vers les casino en ligne aujourd'hui. Le Casino en ligne contient également un certain nombre de formateurs de jeu pour les jeux les plus populaires de casino en ligne! Vous pouvez jouer gratuitement ici sur le site et recevoir des conseils de stratégie de l'entraîneur sur le chemin. Notre dévotion au jeu en ligne nous met en mesure de vous proposer les meilleures affaires en bonus avec les meilleurs casinos en ligne. Cela signifie plus d'argent dans votre poche. Restez branchés pour les bonus de casino plus rentables et les promotions à venir.