Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Sir Christopher Meyer on the West's Strategic Confusion

Former UK Ambassador to the United States and author of 'Getting OUr Way: 500 Years of Adventure and Intrigue: the Inside Story of British Diplomacy' discusses the lessons of history and America's wars.

Daniel Yergin on the Future of Global Energy

Cambridge Research Energy Associates Chairman and Pullitzer-Prize winning author Daniel Yergin discusses the prospects for renewable energy, the oil politics of the Middle East and the future of the hydrocarbon economy.

Jim Locher on Reforming the United States' National Security Architecture

Project on National Security Reform President & CEO Jim Locher discusses how to reform the national security council to focus more on long-term strategic thinking.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page
The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

One Vote '08

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Monday, Dec 31 2007, 1:25AM

one vote 08.jpeg

The "One Campaign" has put together a cool compilation of video commentary from every single one of the presidential candidates on "their plans to combat extreme poverty and global disease."

I have watched six or seven of the clips -- and I think the template they used for this is impressive.

I'd love to see other NGOs organize similar clips around their issues with all of the candidates responding, or avoiding the issue, in digitally recorded formats.

I think folks should bookmark this site -- and see what happens when one candidate after another begins dropping out. Note that Tom Tancredo's thumbnail is now plastered with "No Longer Running for President".

-- Steve Clemons

« Previous Article - Ron Paul Working the Dems
» Next Article - Enough of Soft & Fuzzy Bipartisanship: America Needs a Dissident Ticket

Reader Comments (2) - post a comment

Posted by Koshembos, Dec 31 2007, 3:55PM - Link

I agree to the spirit of this post and want to add two notes.

The situation we have today was produced by aggressive, high-fear tactics of minority political operations within both the Republican and Democratic parties -- that then cowed a party membership that passively followed.

The vote in 2002 to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq has become a symbol. Those that voted Yea are held as second class politician. However, the number of Nay was small (23) and it was relatively easy to be fooled by the lying onslaught of the early Bush regime that close to 9/11.

The main problem with bipartisanship lies in the implied reduction of internal conflicts to weather talk. That's not democracy; it's almost a benign private company with the senators as board members.

Posted by Robin Cohen <Cleverboots2007 @en, Dec 31 2007, 12:18PM - Link

Just became a fan of your writing and thoroughly enjoyed your very cogent "No More Warm and Fuzzy Bipartisanship..." Your comments are preciseand very relevant.Let's hope that Sam Nunn etc. are able to focus on the real issues and can develop a platform/candidate which will attract enough enthusiasm to defeat Hillary or Rudy. The possbility of a Hillary or Rudy Presidency is enough to scare the hell out of any thinking American and, with the exception of Dodd or Biden, election of any of the others would be just as disastrous. Keep up the good work. I look forward to reading more of your writings.

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2009 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.