Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Steve Clemons interviews Eli Pariser

Former Executive Director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser discusses his new book "The Filter Bubble" and how the architecture of the internet is evolving to match our interests and filtering out information that might challenge our opinions.

Steve Clemons on Obama's Approach to Libya

Steve Clemons argues that in addittion to being ineffectual militarily, a no-fly zone will change the narrative of the Libyan uprising and shift the focus from the decisions of the Libyan rebels to the actions of Western nations.

Ian Bremmer On the War Between States and Corporations

Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer discusses the political and economic impacts of the economic recession, as well as rising economic powers.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page

The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

Open Thread: And Then There Were Three. . .

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Friday, Apr 18 2008, 6:26PM

oakley annie buddy.jpg

Meet Buddy, the newest in the clan. Buddy on the left, cuddling with his new brother, Oakley the Amazing Weimaraner.

Little Annie girl is in the foreground.

-- Steve Clemons



« Previous Article - Miliband, China, and the World Without the West
» Next Article - Blogging at Columbus Circle: Candide's Flawed Assault on Hope

Reader Comments (25) - post a comment

Posted by IloveOakley&Annie, Apr 18 2008, 6:34PM - Link

Oakley, Annie and Buddy are all so beautiful and hansome!

Steve, thanks for sharing your puppy pictures. We love them! My
whole family gets the links when I send them out. They make us
so happy. Thank you

Posted by Dan Kervick, Apr 18 2008, 6:44PM - Link

Well that's one thing Steve and I have in common: we both love our dogs.

Except my dog is a mixed up, left wing terrier mutt, and Steve's are elite, out-of touch, purebred Beltway socialites, and enablers of Republican perfidy.

Just kidding. Love Oakley and the clan.

Posted by Mr.Murder, Apr 18 2008, 6:49PM - Link

Do you have a dog in the race?

No, I have three.

Posted by Steve Clemons, Apr 18 2008, 6:51PM - Link

Dan -- you just gave me a very big chuckle....

Posted by PissedOffAmerican, Apr 18 2008, 9:05PM - Link

My dog is a cur as well, Dan. An Australian Shepard and German Shepard mix. Damn thing is smarter than I am, and twice as fast of foot. A bad combo as a puppie, as far as training goes. But undoubtedly will prove to be assets as he matures.

I'm thinking about teaching him to eat anyone displaying an '04 Bush/Cheney bumper sticker.

Posted by David, Apr 18 2008, 9:23PM - Link

POA,

I had a half dachshund/half beagle who was the fastest, smartest dog I have ever known. We calculated that he had an actual vocabulary of about 120 words, and I'm quite sure that as long as there was plenty of food involved, he would have happily and capably manned Sputnik. He would have eaten anyone or anything displaying a Bush/Cheney '04 bumper sticker, provided I smeared a little chicken or ham fat on it (we did control his diet, much to his dismay). He once chewed up an aluminum Budweiser can I foolishly left beside the lawn chair. Dad had corrupted him giving him sips of Heineken's on the municipal dock at Cedar Key before I intervened. Had that dog for nearly nearly sixteen years, and his compatriot, a miniature dachshund who was quite sure she was a smarter reincarnation of Cleopatra, for seventeen years.

That was good, Dan. That kind of chuckle goes a long way, especially in these insane times.

Posted by PissedOffAmerican, Apr 18 2008, 10:10PM - Link

Well Dan, between you, myself, Steve, and Dan we have a pack of dogs whose combined IQ eclipses that of Bush, Cheney, and four of their top advisors.

Speaking of Bush, and dogs, have you been following this piece of shit Johnson's flip-off to Congress, the American people, and a Supreme Court order?

I post it here in the hopes that Hillary and Obama have campaign staff monitoring this blog, and that they can carry word back to Hillary and Obama that they can quit fuckin' us over with bullshit issues, and start doing the jobs we pay them to do. They can start by demanding the arrest of this criminal Johnson. They need to know that not all of us are engaged in their pathetic little circle jerk, and that a good many Americans ARE paying attention to their dereliction of duty and their failure to abide by their Oaths Of Office.

If you go to the link, be sure to read the comments. I am not the only American that is sick and tired of this appalling display of COWARDICE and criminal COMPLICITY from our so called "leaders" in the Democratic party.....

http://tinyurl.com/6q7lbp


Again, EPA Asserts Executive Privilege against Embarrassment

By Paul Kiel - April 18, 2008, 11:59AM

EPA chief Stephen Johnson has deployed a variety of methods to thwart Congressional scrutiny. There's been old fashioned stonewalling. Testimonial gobbledygook. And of course fleeing the hemisphere.

But there's another recurring method: refusing to turn over internal EPA documents because they would "confuse" the public. Back in January, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) wanted documents that show Johnson ignored his staff when he blocked California's attempt to institute tough greenhouse gas limits on cars and trucks. The EPA said no, in part because "further disclosure could result in needless public confusion about the Administrator's decision." In other words, EPA experts said one thing and Johnson had said another. You can't have that getting out (even though it did).

Staffers from the Senate environmental committee, which Boxer chairs, were finally able to see the documents, but only in EPA offices, and only then after peeling off layers of white tape which the EPA had used to redact the offending portions of the documents.

Now the House global warming committee is after Johnson for his agency's failure to comply with a Supreme Court decision that declared that the EPA had to regulate greenhouse gases. Chairman Ed Markey (D-MA) issued a subpoena for documents that show that the EPA had complied with the Court last December. EPA staff completed work on the matter (as they've told Congressional investigators), but the political leadership has been sitting on it since then.

But Johnson, who's deployed a succession of transparent delaying tactics to avoid regulating greenhouse gases, doesn't want to fork them over. His associate administrator writes:

"...EPA has grave concerns relating to the Committee's subpoena. In particular, we are concerned that the release of the deliberative, pre-decisional documents that do not reflect the Agency's final thinking would be injurious to important Executive Branch institutional prerogatives: such release may have a chilling effect on further deliberations in this and other matters; it may create erroneous impressions of the Agency's thinking; and it may raise questions about the Agency having reacted in response to, or having been influenced by, proceedings in a legislative or public forum outside the established administrative process."


The President has made clear that he doesn't want to see stricter mandatory limits on greenhouse gases anytime soon. If California was able to have its strict limits (standards that would also be adopted by more than a dozen other states), or if the EPA were to obey the Supreme Court and follow the Clean Air Act, it would result in a "regulatory nightmare." In other words, lower limits on greenhouse gas emissions. And the EPA is clearly doing everything it can to fight such an outcome.


Posted by Kathleen, Apr 18 2008, 10:25PM - Link

Since my children are grown, I now just have two cats, Foxy and Fancy, Remember Fitz? I found Citizenspook interesting on that topic..

Blog: citizenspook
Post: LIBBY WAS JUST AN APPETIZER. CHEF FITZGERALD WONT SERVE THE MAIN COURSE UNTIL FEBRUARY 2009.
Link: http://citizenspook.blogspot.com/2007/02/libby-was-just-appetizer-chef.html

-

Posted by PissedOffAmerican, Apr 18 2008, 10:54PM - Link

I meant....

"Well David, between.....yadayada..."

Posted by Paul Norheim, Apr 18 2008, 11:32PM - Link


Well folks,
you all obviously love your dogs and love to talk about animals,
but it`s hard to keep your inner zoon politicon silent for more
than a couple of minutes, isn`t it?

Posted by liz, Apr 19 2008, 6:54AM - Link

Buddy looks like he is all settled in with the Annie and Oakley Clemmons Club. Thanks for sharing these pics. I come here for the dog pictures.... but enjoy the political stuff too LOL

Posted by PissedOffAmerican, Apr 19 2008, 10:19AM - Link

Well, heck, this blog is going to the dogs.

But, seeing as how its an open thread.......

I sat down yesterday and ate lunch with a latino, a Mexican gardener that was trimming trees at a high end remodel I am working on in Bakersfield near the Country Club. This remodel is extensive, and has been going on for some time now. I have come to know a few of the groundskeepers on a first name basis. This particular worker is an admitted illegal, no green card. He has worked here in the United States for over a decade now, and supports his family, who are also here illegally, with his earned wages.

The interesting thing is, he also maintains two rental properties, that he owns, in Tecate, Mexico. Interesting why? Because he spends his weekends there, in Tecate.

So, while Steve is pulling his shoes off at the airport, and citizens at LAX are being subjected to camera imagery that can tell the examiner whether or not you have a wart on your right ass cheek, and this fucking albatross the DHS is figuring out how to spell "facism" with a capital F, our borders are no more secure than they were on 9/10/2001. This fellow literally walks across our Southern Border, illegally, twice a week, and has been doing so for over a decade.

So, you tell me. Why does our government feel the need to perpetrate this SCAM called the "Global war On Terror" on the citizens of the United States? What are they prepping us for?

Bend over, this is gonna hurt.

Posted by sdemetri, Apr 19 2008, 12:31PM - Link

Pick a city, POA, any city, medium to large....

Posted by questions, Apr 19 2008, 1:12PM - Link

POA,

Politics of distraction.... Putting your two posts together into a coherent story could be fun! Something about how it would just be too confusing to explain our border policy or to note that there's no such thing as real security, or a real security threat. The enemy is faked, the response is faked, someone makes money selling solutions to fake problems. The feminist lit on the cosmetics industry speaks nicely to this issue! Wonder if Neal Bush sells airport equipment part-time? (He sells elementary school reading material in keeping with NCLB.)

Posted by JohnH, Apr 19 2008, 6:17PM - Link

Speaking of dogs, Arabs have a saying--

The caravan passes
Dogs bark

In five words, this describes the current situation in American politics. The rich and powerful and their lackies run the caravan and let everyone else bark--to a point. They even promote their own bark-fest on TV, carefully limiting the yapping to politically acceptable howling.

If you sniff up in the right spots, bark up the right trees, and learn to heel ostentatiously, you might even get promoted to Prime LapDog Minister, like the pride of Britain--Tony B-liar.

But the times are a changing. The dogs are getting restless. Gotta keep your eye on Annie, Oakley and Buddy...

Posted by henry, Apr 19 2008, 8:25PM - Link

How do you get them to sleep on the cushions / dog beds? My dog is afraid of them. Also, does each dog identify with and sleep on its very own "bed," or do they just sleep on whichever bed is available? Henry.

Posted by PissedOffAmerican, Apr 19 2008, 11:21PM - Link

"How do you get them to sleep on the cushions / dog beds?"

Waterboard 'em.

Posted by karenk, Apr 20 2008, 12:22PM - Link

POA makes an excellent point, they're scanning us from head to toe, reading our e-mails and tapping our phones even as illegals, consisting of God only knows who, pour in through our open borders.

Posted by Bartolo, Apr 20 2008, 6:39PM - Link

As someone with a blemish on my right cheek, I resent POA's tone.

Posted by Kathleen, Apr 20 2008, 6:55PM - Link

Speaking of dogs, how about Darth on Darth??? Dick's Schtick was rather humorous. I thinks it's interesting that he 's still thinking about being called Darth...it's the second time he's mentioned it to the press... I think it does deep down bug him..teeheee. His ending was rather ominous.. leaving the top of the press with the same advice he gave to Senator Leahy.. someone with that much indifference to public opinion has something up his sleeve. So what else is new?

Posted by PissedOffAmerican, Apr 20 2008, 9:18PM - Link

"As someone with a blemish on my right cheek....."

Yeah, I know. We're watching you veeeeery close.

Posted by Kathleen, Apr 20 2008, 9:32PM - Link

So when Darth said Hillary was mistaking her trip to Bosnia with that time he took her hunting, was he telling us that Hillary was the woman reflected in his glasses?

Posted by David, Apr 20 2008, 11:35PM - Link

His glasses were the women reflected in Hillary, Kathleen. Or was it The women were his glasses reflected in Hillary. Damned, now I'm confused, which is exactly what Johnson said would happen. I'm going to bed now.

Posted by bubba, Apr 21 2008, 9:52AM - Link

Love the dogs. Three is a big step up, though Steve. I have three big mutts and taking them all for a walk can get a bit hairy (no pun intended).

Can't say my dogs are anything special, but when I tell my smallest to "go Cheney" she runs outside and poops.

Posted by Frank, Apr 21 2008, 11:21AM - Link

Steve I see where you get your spiritual uplifting..Balancing out the toxic cloud generated by your professional endeavours appears that a need for three dogs is necessary in your home environment to "cope" with the Orwellian stench clinging to your person after foreign policy seminars. If you get a fourth, it will signal to me, a more grim foreign policy future for our country.

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2010 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.
En ligne pas cher tadalafil 20mg acheter cialis sans ordonnance en France les informations relatives au mode d'action et les effets secondaires. Le jeu en ligne est devenu une industrie millions de dollars avec des joueurs de partout dans le monde des paris sur les jeux de casino en ligne. La gamme exclusive de jeux de casino soutenu par caractéristiques exceptionnelles et des avantages a surpassé le glamour de casinos terrestres. Même les gens qui n'ont jamais été à un casino sur terre, ou joué tout jeu de casino jamais, deviennent attirés par le monde exceptionnel de jeux en ligne. Vous pourriez vous demander ce qui rend le jeu en ligne si populaire, quand il n'y a pas de concessionnaire réel, pas de vraie foule, pas de serveuses glamour et pas de boissons gratuites. Ci-dessous sont cinq raisons fondamentales pour lesquelles un grand nombre de joueurs de casino se dirigent vers les casino en ligne aujourd'hui. Le Casino en ligne contient également un certain nombre de formateurs de jeu pour les jeux les plus populaires de casino en ligne! Vous pouvez jouer gratuitement ici sur le site et recevoir des conseils de stratégie de l'entraîneur sur le chemin. Notre dévotion au jeu en ligne nous met en mesure de vous proposer les meilleures affaires en bonus avec les meilleurs casinos en ligne. Cela signifie plus d'argent dans votre poche. Restez branchés pour les bonus de casino plus rentables et les promotions à venir.