Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Steve Clemons interviews Eli Pariser

Former Executive Director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser discusses his new book "The Filter Bubble" and how the architecture of the internet is evolving to match our interests and filtering out information that might challenge our opinions.

Steve Clemons on Obama's Approach to Libya

Steve Clemons argues that in addittion to being ineffectual militarily, a no-fly zone will change the narrative of the Libyan uprising and shift the focus from the decisions of the Libyan rebels to the actions of Western nations.

Ian Bremmer On the War Between States and Corporations

Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer discusses the political and economic impacts of the economic recession, as well as rising economic powers.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page

The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

USUN Gives Luntz a Platform

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Monday, Apr 07 2008, 2:38PM

The U.S. Mission to the United Nations is hosting a briefing on the 2008 presidential elections later this week. The three speakers are Former Rep. David Bonior from the Edwards campaign, Former Lt. Gov. Kerry Healey from the Romney campaign, and Frank Luntz.

It's the appearance by Luntz, the architect of the Bush administration's fear and terror frames, that caught my attention. First, Luntz's inclusion tips the balance of the panel in favor of conservatives/Republicans over progressives/Democrats -- but I'm not too nitpicky about these sorts of ratios. More importantly, Luntz has had no formal involvement in the election. His claim to credibility on this topic is rooted in his exploits as a pollster, which have earned him reprimands from the American Association for Public Opinion Research and the National Council on Public Polls for two separate infractions.

That this event is taking place at the United Nations adds irony to the story. Just over eighteen months ago, Luntz participated in a UN bash-o-rama coordinated by the Hudson Institute in New York. There, he released new polling data that, according to him, shows that the UN had emerged as a wedge issue that could decide a presidential election and that Americans were "one scandal away from washing their hands" of the UN. Even a cursory look at secondhand reports of the polling reveals bias in the language of the questions (and, more importantly, recent, credible polling arrives at opposite conclusions).

It seems to me that Frank Luntz is the least appropriate person to speak at this forum. Well...John Bolton could probably give him a run for his money. But there's no good reason to give Luntz this platform.

-- Scott Paul



« Previous Article - Petraeus for President? and the Fall of Penn, Inc.
» Next Article - Hillary Clinton's Call to Boycott Olympic Ceremonies is Way Wrong-Headed

Reader Comments (14) - post a comment

Posted by Kathleen, Apr 07 2008, 5:44PM - Link

Hmmmm, sounds like an attempt to mobilize the anti UN neo-cons and to flex muscle at the UN, Maybe an atempt to twist-spin that the UN is intruding into domestic politics. Twisted minds do twisted things.

The US Mission to the UN is hosting a briefing on the presidential elections. Is this a FIRST for our Mission?

Is it time to man the Bolton Battle stations again?

Posted by Steve Clemons, Apr 07 2008, 5:50PM - Link

Scott -- interesting post. I have heard Frank Luntz speak a number of times now and think that it's better to hear Frank out and have him engaged with international institutions and the discussion about them than not. I think that there is a lot of material that Frank has to offer that would be useful for progressives.

Steve Clemons

Posted by Kathleen, Apr 07 2008, 6:06PM - Link

P.S. will Condi be present... or will someone soft ball a question about her potential entry into the presidential elections? Who decided to do this, any clues?

Posted by David, Apr 07 2008, 8:45PM - Link

While I think it is good to know at all times what Frank Luntz is up to and what he is thinking about, I have to agree with Scott Paul on this one. The deck is stacked. Here's hoping David Bonior can more than hold his own, but I've always thought David Bonior was more of a representative who was pretty sound on the issues than someone who is an effective spokesperson for those issues.

Who is the moderator, who is the producer, and ditto to the question about whose idea this was. This ain't like something Steve Clemons would assemble or oversee.

Posted by Frank Luntz, Apr 08 2008, 7:55AM - Link

This is Frank Luntz here. Just for the record, I was invited to speak because I have conducted instant response dial sessions at every Democratic and Republican debate over the past year -- roughly 40 in all. And I only said yes because it is a non-partisan forum where we would discuss issues and voter attitudes without having to score partisan points.

This has nothing to do with neo-cons, attitudes towards the UN, or John Bolton. It is a briefing for the foreign press about election 08. I plan to highlight Obama's success and why he is likely to be the next president ... unless you all object. So top whining.

Posted by Scott Paul, Apr 08 2008, 8:29AM - Link

Frank:

I should say for the record, as you might have noticed, that I'm speaking only for myself here and not for Steve.

You may very well have some insights into this year's presidential election, and I don't doubt you will offer an honest assessment based on your instant response dial sessions. But this isn't just any briefing for foreign press on the elections. It's a briefing for the UN press corps hosted by the U.S. Mission.

In my view, the polling you did in 2006 for the Hudson Institute was a hatchet job on the UN, not a fair picture of American attitudes toward the institution. The few members of the press corps that I've spoken with agree. With all due respect, the U.S. Mission could have invited any number of pollsters or public opinion experts that do not carry this baggage.

Frank, I am fully aware that this has nothing to do with neocons or American attitudes toward the UN, and I'm sure your insights are valuable. And I respect your right to participate in the event -- no foul play on your part here. But I think the U.S. Mission has demonstrated some poor judgment by including you in this event for this audience.

Posted by PissedOffAmerican, Apr 08 2008, 10:29AM - Link

"It is a briefing for the foreign press about election 08. I plan to highlight Obama's success and why he is likely to be the next president"

Instead, why don't we focus on why NONE of these three pathetic posturing politicos should be able to weasel their way into the Oval Office.

Tell us, Luntz, what these three have done to rein in this criminal and malfeasant Executive Administration. Or are you just a accomplice to the destruction of everything we once stood for?

Posted by citizen, Apr 08 2008, 10:41AM - Link

Frank,

you seem a little defensive. Your enron numbers have been used to justify crimes of treason and the loss of life of thousands...your bank account is filled with gold from the traitors that lied to the world, milead our country and sacrificed hundreds of thousands in life and limb. The house of luntz shall are permanently stained with the blood of treason.


Citizen

Posted by Nicole, Apr 08 2008, 6:20PM - Link

I'm the Deputy Director of the Press Office at the US Mission to the UN -- a 15-year government employee who has worked for several Administrations. Dr. Luntz will serve as moderator for our panel discussion. We invited him for his expertise and ability to clearly explain the American electoral process. I have heard him speak and respectfully suggest that the bloggers on this page do the same...
I invited Dr. Luntz to speak and I'm proud of it.

Posted by Kathleen, Apr 08 2008, 7:56PM - Link

Nicole... is holding press briefings at the US Mission at the UN on the presidential elections a regular thing or is this the first time? It stikes me as new. Is this the US Mission in N.Y.?

Posted by PissedOffAmerican, Apr 08 2008, 8:30PM - Link

"We invited him for his expertise and ability to clearly explain the American electoral process"

Really??? Well, geez, why not just invite Kenneth Blackwell, or one of the executives of ES&S or Diebold?

I mean hey, you might as well give 'em the truth, and ya might even help a few UN nations pick up a few pointers on how to steal an election or two.

Posted by DonS, Apr 08 2008, 9:17PM - Link

Nicole, respectfully, your gratuitous condescension, despite your pedigree, makes the case for defensiveness. Surely you could have found someone without this baggage.

To Steve's point about progressives taking a lesson or two from Luntz, touche. Also, a pathetic commentary on our society. In its best light, aseptic manipulation is still manipulation.

BTW, kudos to Scott Paul for taking a risk or two. We don't need no stinking sacred cows ;)

Posted by citizen, Apr 09 2008, 12:42AM - Link

Nicole,

perhaps you could dig up hitler's collaborators for the next panel...America is sure you would be proud of them also....great work!! tens of thousands of american life and limb spread throughout iraqi soil...4.5 million homeless iraqi living in poverty...bin laden dances free in tora bora...you have served your country with dignity...look in the mirror.

Citizen

Posted by Kathleen, Apr 10 2008, 2:08PM - Link

I still think it is strange that the State Department decided to use the US Embassy at the UN to host a press briefing on the oresidential elections with representative of two former canididates. Is this the norm for presidential election years? I Ihink this is a first and it has more to do with the "Condti for VEEP" campaign, soto voce, so to speak.

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2010 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.
En ligne pas cher tadalafil 20mg acheter cialis sans ordonnance en France les informations relatives au mode d'action et les effets secondaires. Le jeu en ligne est devenu une industrie millions de dollars avec des joueurs de partout dans le monde des paris sur les jeux de casino en ligne. La gamme exclusive de jeux de casino soutenu par caractéristiques exceptionnelles et des avantages a surpassé le glamour de casinos terrestres. Même les gens qui n'ont jamais été à un casino sur terre, ou joué tout jeu de casino jamais, deviennent attirés par le monde exceptionnel de jeux en ligne. Vous pourriez vous demander ce qui rend le jeu en ligne si populaire, quand il n'y a pas de concessionnaire réel, pas de vraie foule, pas de serveuses glamour et pas de boissons gratuites. Ci-dessous sont cinq raisons fondamentales pour lesquelles un grand nombre de joueurs de casino se dirigent vers les casino en ligne aujourd'hui. Le Casino en ligne contient également un certain nombre de formateurs de jeu pour les jeux les plus populaires de casino en ligne! Vous pouvez jouer gratuitement ici sur le site et recevoir des conseils de stratégie de l'entraîneur sur le chemin. Notre dévotion au jeu en ligne nous met en mesure de vous proposer les meilleures affaires en bonus avec les meilleurs casinos en ligne. Cela signifie plus d'argent dans votre poche. Restez branchés pour les bonus de casino plus rentables et les promotions à venir.