Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Sir Christopher Meyer on the West's Strategic Confusion

Former UK Ambassador to the United States and author of 'Getting OUr Way: 500 Years of Adventure and Intrigue: the Inside Story of British Diplomacy' discusses the lessons of history and America's wars.

Daniel Yergin on the Future of Global Energy

Cambridge Research Energy Associates Chairman and Pullitzer-Prize winning author Daniel Yergin discusses the prospects for renewable energy, the oil politics of the Middle East and the future of the hydrocarbon economy.

Jim Locher on Reforming the United States' National Security Architecture

Project on National Security Reform President & CEO Jim Locher discusses how to reform the national security council to focus more on long-term strategic thinking.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page
The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

TERRORISM SALON: Stephanie Kaplan on the Misplaced Hope of the "Root Causes" Debate

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Thursday, Jul 24 2008, 4:04PM

banner_terrorism_r1_c1.jpg

(Stephanie Kaplan is a Visiting Scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center).

We seem to have reached the consensus that poverty--along with other grievances such as political oppression and cultural alienation--are not reliable indicators of future terrorist activity. Given the prevalence of these conditions throughout the Muslim world, the "root causes" approach overpredicts the level of terrorist activity that we should expect to observe. As Quintan Wiktorowicz notes in Islamic Activism, "[w]hile grievances are ubiquitous, movements are not." The question remains, then, why almost seven years after 9/11, does the root causes debate still shape the counterterrorism discourse?

From a policy perspective, the approach is a seductive one: if we can identify the causes of terrorism, then we can eradicate the conditions that allow terror to take root. At one time or the other, policymakers on both sides of the aisle have found comfort in this formulation. As Peter mentions, this does not mean that global poverty reduction or similar measures shouldn't be a goal of U.S. foreign policy, but the expectation that they will reduce terrorism may be misplaced.

-- Stephanie Kaplan

This week long terrorism salon will continue to be hosted by The Washington Note and UN Dispatch.

« Previous Article - James Glassman on Combating Ideology
» Next Article - Streaming Live Tomorrow: Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy James Glassman

Reader Comments (3) - post a comment

Posted by JohnH, Jul 24 2008, 4:48PM - Link

More ostrich-thinking--"We seem to have reached the consensus that poverty--along with other grievances such as political oppression and cultural alienation--are not reliable indicators of future terrorist activity."

In fact, informed observers have not reached that conclusion. It is smug, Western "experts" who have reached that conclusion, largely to convince themselves that they don't have to do anything about poverty and social injustice.

Here is a knowledgeable insider who disagrees with the recent commentary here: http://www.bariatwan.com/index.asp?fname=2008\07\07-03\2008-06-28-10-21-20.htm&title=%20Al-Qa'idah%20Has%20Not%20Been%20Defeated,%20and%20Here%20Are%20Our%20Reasons

"Islamic extremism, with both its Sunni and Shi'i sides, is increasing, contrary to the belief of those who are described as experts in the east and West. Most of the means that have been used to confront this extremism throughout the past seven years, specifically since the events of September the 11th, have been completely counterproductive. They have been counterproductive because they were mainly security measures and failed to correctly analyse the phenomenon and determine the most effective measures to confront it.

The phenomenon of extremism and its violent and terrorist repercussions came to the surface and became more powerful because of the United States' foreign policies and humiliating and stupid wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and in Palestine (through Israel).

We can now say that this phenomenon is expected to make a greater and more serious leap, prompted by a new factor that emerged in the past three years. It is represented by social injustice and an increasing pressure on the crushed poor class that forms an overwhelming majority in most Arab countries. This situation will provide a fertile environment for hard-line organizations, namely Al-Qa'idah, to recruit hundreds of angry and frustrated youths.

Class hatred is increasing in an alarming rate in the circles of Arab society because of an increasing gap between the rich and poor and the accumulation of thousands of billions in the hands of a small group that represents no more than one per cent of the total population of the Arabs that numbers 400 million."

It is a profound mistake to disregard poverty and social injustice. While those conditions may not alone create terrorism, increasing oppression and degradation of living conditions in the midst of narrowlly based, rising prosperity may well create the conditions for rebellion AKA terrorism.

Posted by Observer, Jul 24 2008, 5:57PM - Link

Why do we keep beating around the bush with this "root-cause" business? The MAIN root-cause for terrorism as we know it, is, and has been, the US's blind support for Israel and its genocidal approach to the Palestinian "problem".

Posted by JohnH, Jul 24 2008, 6:07PM - Link

How about making the next discussion on the causes of International Warmongering? What causes the wealthiest of nations to engage in wars of choice? For clues on the psyche of those who manipulate wealthy nations into war, I recommend Jim Lobe's piece on the neocons:
http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=164

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2009 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.