Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Steve Clemons interviews Eli Pariser

Former Executive Director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser discusses his new book "The Filter Bubble" and how the architecture of the internet is evolving to match our interests and filtering out information that might challenge our opinions.

Steve Clemons on Obama's Approach to Libya

Steve Clemons argues that in addittion to being ineffectual militarily, a no-fly zone will change the narrative of the Libyan uprising and shift the focus from the decisions of the Libyan rebels to the actions of Western nations.

Ian Bremmer On the War Between States and Corporations

Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer discusses the political and economic impacts of the economic recession, as well as rising economic powers.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page

The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

TERRORISM SALON: First Question on "Root Causes"

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Wednesday, Jul 23 2008, 1:02PM

banner_terrorism_r1_c1.jpg

To begin the online terrorism salon Mark Goldberg of UN Dispatch offers the first question on the relationship between poverty and terrorism:

On Day One is a social media site sponsored by the United Nations Foundation and the Better World Campaign that asks everyday people to offer their ideas about what the next president should do, figuratively "on day one." In preparation for this discussion, we solicited On Day One users for their ideas on how the next president should take on the threat of global terrorism and a great many people responded by suggesting that if the United States does more to alleviate poverty in the developing world the terrorist threat could be mitigated.

But is terrorism actually linked to poverty? Is it linked to other externalities, like grievances with American foreign policy, perceived humiliation, nationalist political objectives, radical ideology --- or all of the above? Which is most dominant? Which is most underestimated in current approaches to terrorism?

As an aside, a number of my colleagues and I have done video op-eds for On Day One, as I have mentioned here. In fact my colleague Nick Schmidle -- who has written extensively on "Next Gen Taliban" along Pakistan's frontier provinces -- did a video about dropping the "war on terror" language, something I suspect will get debated during the course of this salon.

--Steve Clemons

This week long terrorism salon will continue to be hosted by The Washington Note and UN Dispatch.

« Previous Article - This Week -- ONLINE TERRORISM SALON Co-Hosted with UN Dispatch
» Next Article - John McCain and the Cold, Heartless World of Op-Eds

Reader Comments (1) - post a comment

Posted by Mr.Murder, Jul 23 2008, 1:54PM - Link

So then, LBJ's War on Poverty was the right idea.

Kissinger tried to convince him to just blow the poor up overseas.

Maybe had the LBJ program been part of foreign policy too, we'd not have made the other mistakes in SE Asia.

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2012 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.
yourclicker.cn