Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Sir Richard Dalton on the Iranian Election Crisis and What's Next

Former UK Ambassador to Iran Sir Richard Dalton discusses the recent domestic turmoil in Iran and its implications for the future of the Islamic Republic.

Flynt Leverett and Kenneth Ballen Discuss the Iranian Presidential Election

Flynt Leverett and Kenneth Ballen analyze the results of a New America Foundation/Terror Free Tomorrow poll that found most Iranians support improved relations with the United States.

Sigmar Gabriel on the Major Economies Meetings on Energy Security and Climate Change

German Federal Minister for the Environment Sigmar Gabriel discusses what a post-Kyoto climate change regime might look like and the differences between the European and American positions.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page
The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

Look for New IAEA Iran Report Monday

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Saturday, Sep 06 2008, 11:37AM

CLOSE  
SOCIAL WEBSITES
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Newsvine
Stumble Upon
EMAIL THIS ARTICLE


Email addresses will not be stored

iaea twn.jpgI just received notice that the next International Atomic Energy Agency report to its board of governors on Iran will be Monday.

Hopefully, I'll get this report soon after distribution to the board from embedded sources and will have the findings here.

-- Steve Clemons

« Previous Article - President Daschle?
» Next Article - Playback: TWN appears on CNN Blogger Panel at Dem Convention Opening

Reader Comments (4) - post a comment

Posted by Helena Cobban, Sep 06 2008, 1:21PM - Link

Sources get to be "embedded"? Steve, I think that's redundant and/or misleading.

Posted by PissedOffAmerican, Sep 06 2008, 1:26PM - Link

The IAEA's reports are only relevant if our media and our politicians present the American public with an honest outline of the findings. So far, obviously, that has not been the case.

Also, one must factor in the very real influence of groups such as AIPAC, who, as I have shown by directly linking to their site in the past, have exagerated, and even lied about, Iran's alleged "nuclear weapons program".

The ludicrous nature of our government's supposed effort to stem "nuclear proliferation" is laughable. As Russia's immense and readily blackmarketed stockpiles have been neglected by this administration, we have seen this steady diet of fearmongering and exageration in regards to the Iranian nuclear aims.

Meanwhile, Pakistan's Kohl walks scotfree, and our own government pursues the development of a new generation of PRE-EMPTIVE and offensive nuclear weapons.

These lying sacks of shit within our own government are FUELING a modern day nuclear arms race with thier reckless deployment of an expensive, incendiary, and unproven missile defense system on Russia's doorstep. If there is any one entity that has moved the specter of nuclear holocaust closer to being a reality, it is these lying treasonous monsters in the Bush Administration, in league with their dangerous neo-con/zionist cohorts.

Like all IAEA reports, this one will be cherry picked for any conclusions that can be used to demonize Iran and advance the neo-con/zionist agenda, while the grist of the report will undoubtedly be buried on the backpages of the our nation's increasingly subservient and complicit media outlets.

And yes Steve, I look forward to those "findings" being posted here.

I sincerely hope that that is what you intend to post, as we have had far too much of a diet of "interpretations" and "think tank analysis" of past "findings".

At first, please, as Sgt Friday used to say, "only the facts". Then, if so moved, I'd love to see you post your analysis and interpretation.

Posted by Steve Clemons, Sep 06 2008, 1:31PM - Link

Helena -- no intention of misleading. Perhaps I used a term I shouldn't have. I'm implying I have a source close in as opposed to a source far out....sorry to set off a red flag.

steve

Posted by blowback, Sep 06 2008, 8:17PM - Link

So when are we going to be able to read the IAEA's report on the Syrian "reactor"?

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2009 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.