Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Sir Christopher Meyer on the West's Strategic Confusion

Former UK Ambassador to the United States and author of 'Getting OUr Way: 500 Years of Adventure and Intrigue: the Inside Story of British Diplomacy' discusses the lessons of history and America's wars.

Daniel Yergin on the Future of Global Energy

Cambridge Research Energy Associates Chairman and Pullitzer-Prize winning author Daniel Yergin discusses the prospects for renewable energy, the oil politics of the Middle East and the future of the hydrocarbon economy.

Jim Locher on Reforming the United States' National Security Architecture

Project on National Security Reform President & CEO Jim Locher discusses how to reform the national security council to focus more on long-term strategic thinking.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page
The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

COLIN POWELL ENDORSES OBAMA

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Sunday, Oct 19 2008, 9:19AM

This morning on Meet the Press, Colin Powell endosed Barack Obama for President of the United States.

Take that, Bill Kristol. . .

-- Steve Clemons

« Previous Article - A $150 Million Month: But Plouffe Says "Not Enough"
» Next Article - Welcome Back to the Fight, Colin. . .

Reader Comments (5) - post a comment

Posted by Bill R., Oct 19 2008, 10:01AM - Link

I love it! This was a redemptive moment for Powell. He called the Rs out on their extremism and made a convincing case to the doubters on an Obama presidency. His curbside interview afterward with NBC was devastating. He attacked Michelle Bachman and her hateful statements about Obama's patriotism and that of Dem. leadership. Kudos to Powell! I could seem him as Sec. Defense in an Obama administration, and helping to set right the misuse of the military that took place under W.

Posted by maye, Oct 19 2008, 10:24AM - Link

I'm glad Powell wants to redeem himself, but I'll borrow a Palinism and say "thanks but no thanks" to Powell in an Obama administration. My money's on Hagel for Sec. Def.

Posted by jsrutstein, Oct 19 2008, 10:26AM - Link

I wasn't happy when Powell chose to come out as a Republican
after leaving the military.
I was disappointed when Powell chose not to run for President
the first time it came up, although I admired his being unafraid
to say it was in deference to his wife's wishes.

I may never forgive Powell for facilitating the war in Iraq by lying
to the world in his presentation to the U.N., although I believe
he sincerely feels worse about that than I ever could.

I don't put a lot in the so-called "character" issue, because I've
been burned on that with people I've been close to, so how I can
really tell with someone I've never met?

I think the key quality to look for in voting for a representative,
especially for President of the U.S., is leadership. I don't think
anyone can question Powell's capacity in this regard. The latest
statement by him this morning on Meet the Press about how it
shouldn't matter even if Obama were a Muslim to me is a perfect
example of leadership on a very important issue right now.

Powell endorsing Obama as his choice to lead us next year,
especially given the challenges we'll face is not the "game
changer" for which the media pine. After all, Obama's already
clearly ahead. But I think Powell's endorsement will prove to be
the game ender, and all I can say is "At last!"

Posted by digdug, Oct 19 2008, 11:32AM - Link

maye wrote:

"I'm glad Powell wants to redeem himself, but I'll borrow a Palinism and say "thanks but no thanks" to Powell in an Obama administration. My money's on Hagel for Sec. Def."


Really? And where was Hagal during the run up to our Iraq invasion? Voicing his concerns? Showing his vision and political courage and arguing against it? Calling for stringent intelligence and objective, realistic thinking?

No. No. No.

Hagal is just as guilty as everyone else of keeping his mouth firmly shut. If he thought Iraq to be such a potential disaster, he displayed absolutly zero political courage in doing so. He only came out against Iraq AFTER popular opinion turned against it.

We should not reward Powell's complaceny during his time in the Bush Admin. And we should not reward Hagal's enabling of the neocon agenda.

Hagal displayed neither leadership nor courage when it mattered most.

I applaud Powell coming out now. He partially redeems himself.

Hagal hasn't even taken this partial step yet.

Posted by digdug, Oct 19 2008, 11:34AM - Link

Apologies for mispelling Hagel's name.

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2009 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.