Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Steve Clemons interviews Eli Pariser

Former Executive Director of MoveOn.org, Eli Pariser discusses his new book "The Filter Bubble" and how the architecture of the internet is evolving to match our interests and filtering out information that might challenge our opinions.

Steve Clemons on Obama's Approach to Libya

Steve Clemons argues that in addittion to being ineffectual militarily, a no-fly zone will change the narrative of the Libyan uprising and shift the focus from the decisions of the Libyan rebels to the actions of Western nations.

Ian Bremmer On the War Between States and Corporations

Eurasia Group President Ian Bremmer discusses the political and economic impacts of the economic recession, as well as rising economic powers.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page

The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

I Spit My Last Breath at Thee

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Wednesday, Dec 03 2008, 10:45AM

HWatson.jpg

Apparently, John Bolton isn't the only one who didn't get the message that he's irrelevant.

Harlan Watson, chief climate negotiator under the Bush Administration, is up to his old tricks. This time, he's not just distorting science -- he's misrepresenting Barack Obama, dismissing prospects for progress, and ignoring the tone of his own boss, all in an official diplomatic capacity representing the United States of America.

According to a friend who's in Poznan, Poland for this year's conference on the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, Watson told the press that Obama's position on getting out in front of developing countries on climate change is identical to Bush's. He said that Obama has been "silent" on the international dimensions of climate climate change. He proclaimed that there would be no Congressional action "anytime soon." Finally, Watson generally derided the prospects for international agreement, saying consensus on long-term targets and baseline years won't be forthcoming.

All this despite insistence from his boss, Under Secretary of State Paula Dobriansky, that the current team plans to politely defer everything important to the next administration. Watson, who was first installed at ExxonMobil's request, doesn't seem to care.

Fortunately, Watson's destructive comments are falling on deaf ears. So far, America's partners are going right on ahead with negotiations, plodding towards an agreement for the next emissions reduction commitment period and discussing how to make the existing regime work.

This is a big week in Poznan -- negotiators are cobbling together the framework for the "long term vision," which may contain a global emissions goal for the principals to negotiate next week. I understand that Ban-Ki Moon is also scheduled to appear. But in the meanwhile, a loose cannon is firing. Hopefully the damage can be controlled.

Stay tuned -- more to come.

-- Scott Paul



« Previous Article - STREAMING LIVE 6:45 pm: NY Times White House Correspondent Helene Cooper
» Next Article - To All Those Waiting for the Obama Team Phone Call

Reader Comments (9) - post a comment

Posted by JohnH, Dec 03 2008, 12:10PM - Link

Thanks for pointing out the direct link between Watson and Exxon. Unfortunately, voices like Watson's and the neo-conmen will not be silenced for long, because immense wealth backs them.

The only way that we'll have a return sane policies is to expose the military-energy-media complex. Then the American people can force already bought politicians to change their stripes and return the country to a more purely capitalist system--one without enormous concentration of wealth and power.

Posted by Bil, Dec 03 2008, 1:11PM - Link

EXCELLENT Title Steve! May I steal it for my first book? With
attribution?

Oh what a beautiful day, Obama fires ALL Bush-appointed fund-
raisers, I mean Ambassadors!

Posted by Cato, Dec 03 2008, 1:25PM - Link

As long as reactionaries go unpunished for their misdeeds, they will continue to engage in them. They damn near managed to bring the whole world down around our ears (two losing land wars in Asia and a financial crisis worse than anything since the Great Depression) and virtually everyone of them will walk away without a scratch, wealthy, and still welcomed in academia, think tanks, and government. What motive do they have for NOT engaging in behavior like Watson's? The answer is that they know they can act with impunity because their opponents are submissive punks. Letting Joe Lieberman go without even a slap on the wrist is a perfect example of this. You advocating for corrupt apparatchiks like Grover Norquist and war criminals like Colin Powell is yet another. Washington specifically and the nation at large generally is primarily run by a corrupt, dysfunctional caste of highly-educated, highly paid people who all have their collective heads up their asses and care for nothing but preserving the power and influence of that caste. Until we learn to disregard them, or even more positively actively castigate and excoriate them, chances for progress are slight.

Posted by ToddinHB, Dec 03 2008, 3:14PM - Link

About that title... isn't that a quote from Ricardo Montalban (as Khan) in Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan?

Posted by Steven jackson, Dec 03 2008, 3:57PM - Link

John Bolton, irrelevant?
What has W. christopher done in Nkorea that amounts to a damn?
The Nkoreans play him like a fiddle and he assumes the position willingly.
Just like it ever was. If you can't fix it hide it behind technicalities. Obfuscate the facts and hope it goes away. John Bolton did not ignore the facts and became inconvienient.
The Nkoreans could not play him so they played chicken. Thus the failed nuclear tests and all the other hubris that upset the little state department minds who run scurrying like little cockroaches trying to appease, so as not to be squashed by their beauracracies appointed apparaticeks, who are the pawns of the politically correct in washington.
Do I make myself scathingly clear?
It is to laugh.

Posted by YY, Dec 03 2008, 4:32PM - Link

Speaking of N Korea, they should keep Chris Hill on as he seems competent and serious.

Posted by Scott Paul, Dec 03 2008, 4:34PM - Link

When I wrote this post I definitely had Montalban's voice in my
head, but the quote is originally from Moby Dick.


Posted by kotzabasis, Dec 04 2008, 6:44AM - Link

Scott Paul in his assessment of Obama's position on climate change will be found to be completely wrong, and Harlan Watson's press statement will be fully justified.

The Rudd government in Australia with its nominally strong position on climate change is already watering down this position. Penny Wong, the Minister of Climate Change who attended the Poznan Conference on her return to Australia is already hinting at a weakening of the government's projections of emissions reduction. And the Obama administration will also do the same.

It's Scott Paul who will be "irrelevant" and not John Bolton, the Moby Dick of American politics.

Posted by dano, Dec 04 2008, 11:46AM - Link

Reading this post I remembered the recent video of Bush at a big international summit meeting when he walked out on stage to join the other leaders and nobody shook his hand. I would assume Watson gets the same treatment even if he hadn't made statements like this.

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2010 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.
En ligne pas cher tadalafil 20mg acheter cialis sans ordonnance en France les informations relatives au mode d'action et les effets secondaires. Le jeu en ligne est devenu une industrie millions de dollars avec des joueurs de partout dans le monde des paris sur les jeux de casino en ligne. La gamme exclusive de jeux de casino soutenu par caractéristiques exceptionnelles et des avantages a surpassé le glamour de casinos terrestres. Même les gens qui n'ont jamais été à un casino sur terre, ou joué tout jeu de casino jamais, deviennent attirés par le monde exceptionnel de jeux en ligne. Vous pourriez vous demander ce qui rend le jeu en ligne si populaire, quand il n'y a pas de concessionnaire réel, pas de vraie foule, pas de serveuses glamour et pas de boissons gratuites. Ci-dessous sont cinq raisons fondamentales pour lesquelles un grand nombre de joueurs de casino se dirigent vers les casino en ligne aujourd'hui. Le Casino en ligne contient également un certain nombre de formateurs de jeu pour les jeux les plus populaires de casino en ligne! Vous pouvez jouer gratuitement ici sur le site et recevoir des conseils de stratégie de l'entraîneur sur le chemin. Notre dévotion au jeu en ligne nous met en mesure de vous proposer les meilleures affaires en bonus avec les meilleurs casinos en ligne. Cela signifie plus d'argent dans votre poche. Restez branchés pour les bonus de casino plus rentables et les promotions à venir.