Advertisers:
advertise on this site


Kenyan Vice President Kalonzo Musyoka Discusses Ongoing Developments in East Africa

Vice President Musyoka calls for the international community to devote more resources to fight terrorism in Somalia, in part by strenghtening the capacity of the Somali government.

Joseph Stiglitz on the Battle of Ideas Over the American Economy

The Nobel Prize-winning economist criticizes the Obama administration's economic policies and argues for a second stimulus and more effective financial regulation.

Daniel Levy and Jim Gerstein on a New Poll of Israeli Attitudes

New America Foundation/Middle East Task Force Director Daniel Levy and pollster Jim Gerstein discuss a new survey of Israeli attitudes toward Obama, Netanyahu, and the peace process.

More videos are available on the Video Archives Page
The Washington Note is now a member of the Political Insiders advertising network:
Find out more...

VA Loan and VA Refinance
Information from VA Mortgage Center



ADVERTISE SEND FEEDBACK OR TIPS CONTACT DETAILS
Support The Washington Note

Using PayPal

Kerry to Move Soon on Law of the Sea

Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Thursday, May 07 2009, 8:14AM

That most famous and frustrating of oceans treaties looks to be back on the Senate agenda. Again.

The momentum is building. Scott Borgeson at the Council on Foreign Relations released a report last week that comprehensively makes the case for U.S. accession to the Law of the Sea Convention. I confess I've only given it a quick skim, but I did notice it hits on all the key points.

Sen. Kerry said last week that he's "gotta get that done." I'm hearing he'd like to start Committee work in June (presumably, the goal would be to have the whole thing wrapped up by August). Joining the Convention could not happen a moment too soon.

unclos_cover.jpg

President Obama and Hilary Clinton watched the treaty languish in the Senate even though there were more than enough votes to get it through. They have to know that passive support from the President is not enough to move a major multilateral treaty. Obama is going to need to really dig in to make this happen.

Fortunately, there's no reason why he shouldn't or won't. The Convention fits nicely into his agenda of reestablishing America's commitment to a balanced national security strategy and the rule of law. Republicans, for their part, will see their caucus splintered over the Convention if they decide to hold it up. The conservative wing of their party cannot afford another loss that highlights its commitment to dead dogma over the national interest.

Since this is much more interesting than my law school finals, I'm going to be watching this closely as it moves forward and I'll be sure to update. I'm also keeping an eye on the Koh confirmation process (if you want to follow it closely, Charlie Brown's been doing yeoman's work tracking the story thus far). One last thing: I'm doing some work for the Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict (CIVIC) this summer on a campaign to get warring parties to compensate civilians for the harm they've caused. It's a lot more legalese and a lot less "grand strategy" than readers here are used to, but internalizing the human costs of war is a pretty humane and commonsense step that states should take at a pretty low cost.

More on all this soon.

-- Scott Paul

Note: Greenwire is tracking Kerry's Law of the Sea plans too. More there.

« Previous Article - Guest Post by Katherine Tiedemann: Pakistan's Aid Conundrum
» Next Article - LIVE STREAM: Lori Wallach and Todd Tucker on How to Get Through the Free Trade Impasse

Reader Comments (3) - post a comment

Posted by Don Kraus, May 07 2009, 5:27PM - Link

Scott - great to see you blogging on this again. Good luck on the finals.

Posted by Mr.Murder, May 09 2009, 1:34AM - Link

Piracy concerns produced suitable pressure. Major items at stake include offshore rights with Cuba and Russia in waters we respectively share with either.

How does this affect long standing policy for Carribean refugees, etc. in their standing here? Has this changed dramatically from the post 9-11 policy, how does either of the past four terms differ?

Posted by Informed Lawyer, May 21 2009, 4:14PM - Link

Rather than seeking a window to move the UNCLOS to a floor vote, Senator Kerry should make a concerted effort to respect his constituents, which include not only residents of Massachusetts, but the US at large. They have a constitutionally guaranteed 'right to know' what is contained in the environmental portion of the UNCLOS, which comprises approximately 1/3 of the 200 page treaty.

Kerry's failure to heed the American public's right to know reflects his disdain for the American people and the US Constitution which, as a Senator, he has taken an oath of office to support.

That is why concerned citizens have taken it upon themselves to research and report about the treaty's more than 45 environmental provisions, regulations, protocols and annexes. Arguably, a number of committees within the House and Senate possess the requisite oversight jurisdiction to review, explain and assess the impact of these provisions upon US constitutionally guaranteed private property rights, US national economic and technological security, US military preparedness, and US sovereignty.

See:

"What Goes Around, Comes Around: How UNCLOS Ratification Will Herald Europe's Precautionary Principle as US Law", an authorized pre-publication advance copy of an article that will appear in the forthcoming issue of the Santa Clara Journal of International Law.

It is accessible on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1356837

Leave a comment:


(required)
(required)
- only for verification, not for display or any other use.

(required)

Type the characters you see in the picture above.


The Washington Note - Steven ClemonsHome - About - Archives - Published - Recommended - Advertise - Contact
THIS SITE IS COPYRIGHT © 2010 THE WASHINGTON NOTE. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.