RSSUsing PayPal
LIVE STREAM: German Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Ruprecht Polenz on the Middle East
Share / Recommend - Comment - Print - Monday, May 18 2009, 10:42AM
CLOSE 
SOCIAL WEBSITES
http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2009/05/live_stream_ger/&title=LIVE STREAM: German Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Ruprecht Polenz on the Middle East&topic=political_opinion" target="_blank">Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Newsvine
Stumble UponEMAIL THIS ARTICLE
One area in which the Obama administration has arguably fallen short of expectations is in its ability to persuade European countries to support its policies in the greater Middle East - and particularly in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
As George Friedman has argued, the Obama administration has succeeded in changing the optics of the transatlantic relationship, but has failed for the most part to achieve real substantial policy shifts.
The Europeans - and the Germans in particular - declined to provide the levels of economic stimulus that the United States wanted to combat the global economic crisis and refused the Obama administration's request to send substantially more troops to Afghanistan.
To offer a German perspective on how to tackle our common challenges in the Middle East, Ruprecht Polenz, Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee of the German Bundestag, will speak at the New America Foundation TODAY from 12:15 - 1:45pm.
The event will stream live here at The Washington Note.
-- Ben Katcher
« Previous Article - Guest Post by Jonathan Guyer: The U.S. Takes Bibi Steps» Next Article - Guest Post by Nicholas Schmidle: The Good News and Bad News About Pakistan You Haven't Heard
Reader Comments (5) - post a comment
I guess that "changing the optics of the transatlantic relationship, but [failing] for the most part to achieve real substantial policy shifts" answers a previous TWN question: "What Comes Next for New Media and Public Diplomacy?"
Concerning Europe it's a good thing that better US PR, and a photogenic president, can't change deeply held, and correctly held, views on the wrongness of blindly bailing out miscreant banks, and sending more young people to kill others and die in the Hindu Kush. So any expectations that the Obama administration had in this regard were thankfully erroneous.
So much for the US and Germany "tackl[ing] our common challenges in the Middle East". Common challenges? Germany is bothered neither by AIPAC nor by Empire building, as the US is. So what are the "common challenges?" Was Germany ever "challenged" by Iraq?
I agree with Don. On a whole range of issues, from the economic
downturn to the military tribunals; from Iran ("all options on the
table") to Israel/Palestine; from Russia to Afghanistan, Barack
Obama appears in substance as BUSH LIGHT. Despite the change
in "optics", his policies on these issues must be read as an
unadmitted tribute to the policies of his predecessor.
The worsening of the transatlantic relations during George Bush
was not primarily an issue of style and optics; it was related to
differences in substance, political differences. Why would anyone
expect a huge change in this relationship if the differences largely
remain the same as when George Bush was in the Oval Office?
One "common challenge" the US and Germany DON'T share is current account balances.
world ranking, country, CAB, USD, bn (2007)
2, Germany, 252.501
181, United States, -731.214
When one considers how much better German live than Americans in terms of working conditions, living conditions and health care, and they are doing so much better economically, then one must conclude that the country is probably managed better, and this also provides a clue as to why Germans "declined to provide the levels of economic stimulus that the United States wanted to combat the global economic crisis and refused the Obama administration's request to send substantially more troops to Afghanistan." They simply know better, in spite of the changed "optics." They_know_better.
So I shout hurrah! that the Obama administration "has failed for the most part to achieve real substantial policy shifts" in Germany. Good for the Germans.
Hey, here's an idea I hadn't thought of before. How about the US undergoing its own "real substantial policy shifts" to something more sensible, say on the idea of German performance. Sure, it would mean chucking American Exceptionalism, but would it be so bad to be better off?
Germany has built its commercial success within the framework of a reasonably disciplined monetary policy, a model that some other countries find attractive. For example this week Germany's parliament voted against charging taxpayers with all the banks' losses, including toxic assets.
The German politician's comments on EU energy security were interesting. He didn't mention Nabucco and Turkey, but favoured discussion of a gas pipeline from Iran to India via Pakistan [IPI]. I gather the US is enthusiastic about both Nabucco and a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to India via Afghanistan and Pakistan [TAPI].
Anyway all pipelines would be far from Britain - a heavy investment there in renewable energy seems necessary.
Germany has built its commercial success within a reasonably disciplined monetary policy, a model that some other countries find attractive. For example this week Germany's parliament voted against charging taxpayers with all the banks' losses, including toxic assets.
The German politician's comments on EU energy security were interesting. He didn't mention Nabucco and Turkey, but favoured discussion of a gas pipeline from Iran to India via Pakistan [IPI]. I gather the US is enthusiastic about both Nabucco and a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to India via Afghanistan and Pakistan [TAPI].
Anyway all pipelines would be far from Britain - a heavy investment there in renewable energy seems necessary.
Leave a comment: