I would have been interested to hear what you have to say about this posturing fraud Obama's decision to try to block the release of the photos. Obama's statement that these photos are "unsensational" would seem to argue for their release.

But, then again, we all KNOW he's lying, don't we? Fantastic, we've replaced one scumball liar with another.

Thanks, Steve, for the kind words and helpful suggestions. Fortunately, we do have the programs in digital form and are working on making them more accessible to listeners everywhere. For the time being, they are linked to The Seed Show group on Facebook. They are in mp3 format and appear in mostly chronological order. The file name is the date and the featured guest's name (yyyymmddjohnsmith.mp3).

. . ." Obama's decision to try to block the release of the photos. "

He said he heard from the commanders in the field, particularly this scary special ops-bot McChrystal. And we all know that the opinion of the military brass trumps the constitution. So, voila.

Of course you can't rule out pure and simple political expediency, since the government's supression seems likely to lose in court, and then Obama can get say "I tried", but the material is out there anyway.

Emptywheel has some interesting thoughts, first about Obama's move discounting newly issued FOIA guidelines, and a suggestion to publicize the outcomes of the supposed abuse investigations from '04:

http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/05/13/about-the-foto-flip-flop/

And naturally Jonathan Turley cogently points out the chapter and verse on how Obama's flip flop flies in the face of the very essence of the court ruling for disclosure. I guess being Pres means you can ignore court rulings. Oh wait, that was a Bush unitary executive posture.

http://jonathanturley.org/2009/05/13/obama-reverses-decision-and-refuses-to-release-abuse-photos/#more-10916

You should more focus on the touch pad/ track pad which is one of the worst things for accessibility, among ergonomics.