Key Quotes:

 

On Bolton’s “Diplomacy”

 

“Some people have the possibility to build consensus, others operate in other ways.” -- Adamantios Vassilakis, Ambassador for Greece, diplomatically criticizing Bolton’s methods[i]

 

“He marches to a different drum and the drum is out of tune.” -- Jack Pritchard, special envoy for negotiations with North Korea, who had to bring the parties back to the table after Bolton called Kim Jung-Il a “tyrannical dictator”[ii]

 

“He lives in another world, with this belief that he is morally superior, and the U.S. is more moral than all the countries around the world.  It is a pity.” -- Oswaldo de Rivero, Ambassador for Peru[iii]

 

 “He's a real force here, but in a way that provokes a lot of reaction and opposition from others.  What you needed was an ambassador who would heal, not deepen, rifts." – Mark Malloch Brown, Deputy Secretary General[iv]

 

“The job now is to get clarity on what the U.S. wants.’’ – Emyr Jones Parry, British Ambassador, after Bolton abruptly rejected the Human Rights Council document after skipping meetings and failing to inform negotiators about “deal breakers”[v]

 

 “We’re not in favor of holding any individual items, or the budget, hostage to other issues.  The EU position is that we want the budget adopted the normal way.” – Emyr Jones Parry, British Ambassador, rejecting Bolton’s technique of making the UN Budget contingent upon reform[vi]

 

“We didn’t even have the opportunity to discuss it.  We had no chance to express our views, and I am confident if we had had such a meeting we would have been able to come up with a balanced text. This is the way the Security Council ... has always functioned.” -- Algerian Ambassador Abdallah Baali, blaming Bolton’s brusqueness for failing to secure a condemnation of a suicide attack on Israel[vii]

 

Bolton has his own agenda.  He honestly believes that anything on paper is meant to constrain the United States, and the United States is so strong it can get whatever it wants without agreeing to constrain itself. Yet we couldn’t call Condoleezza Rice every day and say ‘do you know what your guy is doing?’” -- Stephen Stedman, former special advisor to Kofi Annan and one of the Summit Outcome Document’s architects, on how Bolton set back U.S. interests[viii]

 

“The General Assembly has generally felt that its power and its influence is being diminished.” – Kofi Annan, on suspicions by many countries that Bolton was engaged in a “power grab” by moving issues from the GA to the Security Council[ix]

 


Bolton on the UN:

 

“It’s a target-rich environment.” – On what he had enjoyed most about working at the UN[x]

 

“The U.N. is one of many competitors in a marketplace of global problem solving." – Bolton, describing why the US "may need to find another organization to accomplish our objectives" if the UN does not respond to U.S. demands

 

“He did not see or understand that the UN was only an instrument of American policy, not the policy itself…He forgot that the UN was an instrument to be used to advance America’s foreign policy interests, not to engage in international social work” – On Bill Clinton’s crucial mistake[xi]

 

“He is not the president of the world. He is not a diplomat for all seasons. He is not Mr. Friend of the Earth. And, most definitely of all, he is not the commander in chief of the World Federalist Army. He is the chief administrative officer. Nothing less than that, to be sure, but, with even greater certainty, nothing

more.” – On the UN Secretary General[xii]

 

“The UN is only a tool, not a theology. It is one of several options we have, and it is certainly not invariably the most important one.” [xiii]

 

“The danger of the ‘multilateral temptation’ is that one will resort to the U.N. reflexively. That reduces America's unilateral or non-U.N. options, and could even erode its sovereignty.” – On why multilateralism is wrong[xiv]

 

“While treaties may well be politically or even morally binding, they are not legally obligatory. They are just not “law” as we apprehend the term. And what happens to countries when they do not adhere to international law on some matter? Usually nothing. Why, then, do we continue to talk about international “law”? Because the word has a strong emotive appeal.” – On why international law does not exist[xv]

 

“For 50 years on a bipartisan basis, we have tried to keep the UN out of the Middle East conflict because it is not an honest broker. And now it's been invited in. We can't tell the consequences of that.” – On why it is a mistake to involve the UN in the Middle East[xvi]

 

“If you lost ten stories today, it wouldn't make a bit of difference. The United Nations is one of the most inefficient, intergovernmental organizations going. UNESCO is even worse, and others go downhill from there. The fact of the matter is that the international system that has grown up…has been put into a position of hiring ineffective people who do ineffective things, that have no real world impact.” – On the UN[xvii]

 

“There is no United Nations. There is an international community that occasionally can be led by the only real power left in the world, and that’s the United States, when it suits our interests, and when we can get others to go along. I think it would be a real mistake to count on the U.N. as if it’s some disembodied entity out there that can function.” – On why the UN only exists to serve U.S. needs[xviii]

 


Bolton on Multilateralism and International Law:

 

It is a big mistake for us to grant any validity to international law even when it may seem in our short-term interest to do so - because, over the long term, the goal of those who think that international law really means anything are those who want to constrict the United States. We ought to be concerned about this so-called right of humanitarian intervention.” – On why he opposed intervention in Kosovo[xix]

 

“War is often an entirely rational calculation, and preventive diplomacy can no more stop it than it can reverse the power of gravity.” – On why preventative diplomacy does not work[xx]

 

“The key to the administration’s fondness for “multilateralism” is that such an approach offers cover and allows the White House to duck tough decisions.” --  On why multilateralism equals cowardice[xxi]

 

“Harder to understand [than Annan’s motives] is why the Clinton administration allowed him to go at all, or permitted him any negotiating flexibility.”—On why Annan should not have been allowed to seek a peaceful end to Iraq’s weapons programs[xxii]

 


Bolton’s Management Style:

 

“He is a quintessential kiss-up, kick-down sort of guy. There are a lot of them around. I'm sure you've met them.  But the fact is that he stands out, that he's got a bigger kick and it gets bigger and stronger the further down the bureaucracy he's kicking.” -- Carl Ford, Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research, on Bolton’s abuse of employees

 

“That's simply not good government. It's not excellence in government. It's a serial abuser.” – Carl Ford, on Bolton’s management style

 

“He was so far over the line that he’s one of the, sort of, memorable moments in my career.” – Carl Ford, describing the “tongue lashing” Bolton meted out to an analyst with whom he differed

 

“He is incapable of listening to people and taking into account their views. He would be an abysmal ambassador.” -- Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell’s chief of staff, describing Bolton[xxiii]

 

“I differ from a lot of people in Washington,  both friend and foe of Under Secretary Bolton, as to his ‘brilliance.’  I didn't see it. I saw a man who counted beans, who said, ‘98 today, 99 tomorrow, 100 the next day,’ and had no willingness -- and, in many cases, no capacity -- to understand the other things that were happening around those beans. And that is just a recipe for problems at the United Nations.” -- Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, on Bolton’s ideological approach

 

“He was yelling and screaming, and red in the face, and wagging his finger. I'll never forget the wagging of the finger. That's perhaps his style.” – Christian Westermann, intelligence analyst, on Bolton’s demeanor when Westermann told him the intelligence community did not agree with his language on Cuba’s weapons

 


Bolton’s Handling of Intelligence

 

“I left that meeting with the perception that I had been asked for the first time to fire an intelligence analyst for what he had said.” – Carl Ford, on Bolton’s request that an intelligence analyst be removed when his views clashed with Bolton’s own

 

“Chilling.” – Carl Ford, describing the effect of Bolton’s intimidation of analysts on the intelligence community[xxiv]

 

“It’s perfectly all right for a policymaker to express disagreement with an NIO or an analyst, and it’s perfectly all right for them to challenge such an individual vigorously, challenge their work vigorously. But I think it’s different to then request, because of the disagreement, that the person be transferred.” – John McLaughlin, Deputy Director for Central Intelligence, on Bolton’s attempt to remove an analyst who disagreed with his views[xxv]

 

“Disagreements or different viewpoints on analysis do not constitute pressure. It's the threat of my job, the removal and the continued sanctioned [sic] that I found to be pressure.” – Christian Westermann, on Bolton’s attempt removed him over his conflicting viewpoints

 

“Hell.” – Melody Townsel, USAID Employee/Subcontractor, describing her life after Bolton began “hounding” her in retaliation for a complaint she made about the company employing him

 

“Truth flew out the window.” -- Melody Townsel, on Bolton’s campaign to intimidate her into rescinding her complaint about his company’s service[xxvi]

 

“Quite the contrary. I worked harder to get him promoted than any other officers that I think has ever worked for me.” – Stuart Cohen, National Intelligence Council Vice Chair, on whether he disciplined an analyst Bolton accused of “poor performance” after the analyst disagreed with his views[xxvii]

 

“He didn’t agree with the views they were expressing.” – John Wolf, Assistant Secretary for Nonproliferation, when asked what Bolton meant when he complained that intelligence analysts “weren’t providing diligent service”[xxviii]

 

“John strongly believed that just because the intelligence community had a

conclusion on an issue, that didn’t necessarily have to be his view… in other words, John felt he had every right to interpret what the evidence meant and come to a different conclusion than the intelligence community.” -- Alan Foley, former head of the CIA’s weapons proliferation center[xxix]

 

“Let’s say that he took isolated facts and made much more of  them to build a case than I thought the intelligence warranted. It was a sort of cherry-picking of little factoids and little isolated bits that were drawn out to present the starkest-possible case.”[xxx] -- Robert Hutchins, former chairman of the National Intelligence Council, describing clashes with Bolton over Syria

 

 

Bolton’s Diplomatic Snafus

 

“We think the only way at this point to mitigate the damage to the United Nations is that the Secretary General Kofi Annan, we think has to personally and publicly repudiate this speech at the earliest possible opportunity. Because otherwise I fear the consequences, not just for the reform effort, but for the organization as a whole.” – Bolton on why Kofi Annan should demand that his Deputy repudiate a speech criticizing right-wing unilateralism. Annan refused.[xxxi]

 

“Let me just give some advice to the Secretariat to remind them how this process works in New York: the member governments give direction to the Secretariat, not the other way round.” – Bolton, when Annan asked that he put aside his public spat with Deputy Secretary Malloch Brown and focus on reform[xxxii]

 

“This is a red pen, and I will draw the red lines for this negotiation right now.” – Bolton at negotiations over the Summit Outcomes Document, as reported by the Century Foundation’s Jeffrey Laurenti [xxxiii]

 

“You have no standing here.” – Bolton to Kofi Annan’s staff, during negotiations on the Summit Outcomes Document[xxxiv]

 

“I brought the gavel down at 10.  I was the only one in the room, though.” – On instituting “discipline” during his term as President of the Security Council, by beginning meetings with only himself present[xxxv]

 

“I think it’s not very polite to start with 11 or 12. The form is important. You are working when you have the 15 members in the room ambassadors or not ambassadors, but (every) seat occupied by the members.” – Cesar Mayoral, Argentina Ambassador, on Bolton’s “discipline” as President of the Security Council, which Mayoral abandoned in his term[xxxvi]

“The United States believes in taking action and being effective, and we don’t apologize to anybody for that.” – Bolton, after Kofi Annan and General Assembly President Jan Eliasson expressed concerns that Bolton was bringing issues to the Security Council that belonged in the General Assembly[xxxvii]

 

“I’m not much of a carrots man.” – Bolton, undercutting Secretary Rice’s efforts to open dialogue with Iran[xxxviii]

 

“Our experience has been that when there is a dramatic change in the life of a country, that’s the most likely point at which they give up nuclear weapons.” – Bolton, endorsing regime change in Iran as Secretary Rice attempted to begin disarmament negotiations[xxxix]



[i]“U.N. action on Iran could boost Bolton,” Bloomberg, 5-11-2006.

[ii]Bolton Wanderer,” Economist, 4-16-2005.

[iii]“U.N. action on Iran could boost Bolton,” Bloomberg, 5-11-2006.

[iv]Bolton Struggles to Steer UN Toward Change, USA Today, 6-08-2006

[v]U.S. Isolated in Opposing Plan for a New U.N. Rights Council ,” New York Times, 3-04-2006.

[vi] “Bolton in a China Shop,” New York Magazine, 1-03-2006.

[vii]U.S. angry at Algeria for blocking U.N. statement condemning Islamic Jihad for Israeli suicide bombing,” AP, 12-07-2005.

[viii]“Bolton in a China Shop,” New York Magazine, 1-03-2006.

[ix] “UN chief concerned with tensions between UN organs,” Xinhua General News Service, 2-20-2006.

[x]“UN ignored corruption findings, claims Bolton,” Sunday Telegraph, 11-05-2005.

[xi] John Bolton, “The Creation, Fall, Rise, and Fall of the United Nations,” Delusions of Grandeur:  The United Nations and Global Intervention, Cato, 1997.

[xii] John Bolton, “The Creation, Fall, Rise, and Fall of the United Nations,” Delusions of Grandeur:  The United Nations and Global Intervention, Cato, 1997.

[xiii] John Bolton, “The Creation, Fall, Rise, and Fall of the United Nations,” Delusions of Grandeur:  The United Nations and Global Intervention, Cato, 1997.

[xiv] John Bolton, “The Creation, Fall, Rise, and Fall of the United Nations,” Delusions of Grandeur:  The United Nations and Global Intervention, Cato, 1997.

[xv]John Bolton, “The Global Prosecutors; Hunting War Criminals in the Name of Utopia,” Foreign Affairs, 1-1999.

[xvi] John Bolton, “Equal Time,” MSNBC, 10-13-2000.

[xvii]John Bolton, Speech to Global Structures Convocation, New York, 2-3-1994.

[xviii]John Bolton, Speech to Global Structures Convocation, New York, 2-3-1994.

[xix] “Just What is a War Criminal?,” Insight on the News, 8-02-1999.

[xx]Testimony before House Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights,” 9-20-2000.

[xxi]“Kofi Hour,” Weekly Standard, March 9, 1998.

[xxii] John Bolton, “Kofi Hour,” Weekly Standard, 3-09-1998.

[xxiii]“Delay is Sought in Vote,” New York Times, 4-19-2005.

[xxiv]Senate Foreign Relations Committee Testimony, 4-12-2005.

[xxv] “Interview With John McLaughlin With Regard to the Bolton Nomination,” U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 4-29-2005.

[xxvi]“Letter to Senate Foreign Relations Committee” 4-15-2005.

[xxvii] Stuart Cohen, “Interview With Stuart Cohen With Regard to the Bolton Nomination,” U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 4-29-2005.

[xxviii] ibid.

[xxix] “Interview With Alan Foley With Regard to the Bolton Nomination,” U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 5-28-2005.

[xxx] Interview With Robert Hutchins With Regard to the Bolton Nomination,” U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 5-06-2005.

[xxxi]“Media Stakeout With Ambassador John Bolton,” Federal News Service, 6-7-2006)

[xxxii]“The Future of the U.S. Relationship With the United Nations,” Centre for Policy Studies, 6-08-2006, http://www.cps.org.uk/pdf/lec/68.pdf .

[xxxiii] “Day to Day,” NPR, 12-30-2005.

[xxxiv] “Bolton in a China Shop,” New York Magazine, 1-03-2006.

[xxxv] “World Briefing,” New York Times, 2-03-2006.

[xxxvi]“Behind the Scenes,” AP, 3-25-2006.

[xxxvii] “AMB. BOLTON ISSUES REMARKS TO PRESS,” Federal News Service, 2-21-2006.

[xxxviii]“Your World,” Fox News, 5-31-2006.

[xxxix] “Bolton rejects ‘grand bargain’ with Iran,” Financial Times, 9-06-2006.