The Sicilian Approach is Un-American

-

When John McCain lost in 2000 to President Bush, his followers were left to wander in the wilderness during President Bush’s first term. They had chosen the wrong horse and Bush’s loyalty-obsessed handlers wanted to make the McCain team pay. By the time the second term came around, there was some loosening but not much.
There are stories percolating now that some Dem campaigns are telling others — “you are with us or you are against us;” “if you help X, then you are dead to us. . .you are nothing;” “you will get no job — no breaks whatsoever if you help X.”
On the Republican side, I’ve been told by some helping one of the two governors that McCain’s team has offered threats that are staggering and at one level, hard to believe — but I know in at least one case, it happened.
This is bad news folks. If confronted about these kinds of behaviors, I’m sure that all of the candidates would individually disavow them. People could even be fired if they were recorded or reported in any manner that was beyond dispute.
But frankly, the country needs to have the kind of election it is having — with no heir apparents, no slam dunks, and lots of debate and discussion.
The final four look to me to be Romney, McCain, Clinton and Obama. All sides need to be respectful — and each needs to understand that very decent people with different frames of reference are trying ot make an important choice about who the next president should be. Let them do it — and respect differences in a civil way.
No one should be threatened or penalized or brow-beaten or harassed to support one candidate over another. Those are tactics deployed by thug regimes — not America, or at least not the America I want to live in.
– Steve Clemons

Comments

23 comments on “The Sicilian Approach is Un-American

  1. TS says:

    How is the “you’re with us or you’re our enemy” approach Sicilian, exactly?
    First, it’s reflective of only a small group of Sicilians who flourished a century ago. Second, didn’t pols like LBJ used this same technique towards people?
    Bully is part of human nature, not Sicilian nature.
    I’m always tickled to find such casual prejudice coming from the left.

    Reply

  2. Carroll says:

    Posted by PissedOffAmerican at January 29, 2008 10:09 PM
    >>>>>>>>>>>>
    Well, FBI then…I am just mentioning what I saw in the London papers…that said the FBI denied the file existed and then someone turned it up.
    What I remember from the article said Edmunds had the exact file number and the file that was said not to exist was discovered and it had the exact file number she said.
    The paper, either the Independent or Times, I can’t remember which one said they or one of their contacts had a copy of the actual file in their possession now.

    Reply

  3. PissedOffAmerican says:

    “The fact that the CIA denied a report existed and then the exact file was turned up by someone else adds some fire.”
    Carroll, please, this is way too important an issue to be discussed without factual information, and careful examination of the “evidence” that is being meted out to us. The file is an FBI file that was sought through the FOIA, and the FBI is denying the file exists, despite some documentation that would seem to suggest otherwise.
    The real hair-raising development is Bush’s sudden rhetoric about supplying Nuclear weapons technology to Turkey, and Wolfowitz being given his new job, right on the heels of Sibel Edmonds accusations being given MSM coverage, albiet British. There is ABSOLUTELY NO WAY these developments could be a “coincidence”.
    Notice Steve’s complete silence on Wolfowitz’s new job? When has Steve ever ignored news about Wolfowitz, expecially a new job position? I wonder, has someone told Steve to drop this issue?

    Reply

  4. PissedOffAmerican says:

    “One of the main reasons I support Obama is that I do think we need a better way of dealing with free speech, dissent, and disagreement at all levels of society. Obama was taught constitutional law by Layrence Tribe who also is supporting him, and Obama also taught constitutional law at University of Chicago Law School. The First Amendment is important as well as civility in respecting that most important of our rights”
    ROFLMAO!!!!!
    Yet Obama publically stated that Bush hasn’t exceded his executive authority, as a justification for not supportring Bush’s impeachment. Yeah, he’s a real advocate for the Constitution, that Obama guy. Yeah right.

    Reply

  5. pt says:

    steve, this is becoming tiresome. Have you any evidence that the Obama campaign has engaged in this? the stories I’ve heard attribute such behavior entirely to the Clinton campaign but you say ‘some democratic campaigns’, thus implying that the Obama campaign has been doing this. I know you have consistently backed Clinton while pretending to be neutral (using the Cuba issue to play a “on the one hand but on the other hand” charade) but this is getting ridiculous. As far as I know, this has been a one sided affair in our party. If you have a different view you need to provide evidence, even if anecdotal and vague to protect sources.

    Reply

  6. Carroll says:

    Posted by Sandy at January 29, 2008 06:12 PM
    >>>>>>>>>>
    It seems Edmunds has gained traction in Europe but not a peep in the press here of course…no where but the net. The fact that the CIA denied a report existed and then the exact file was turned up by someone else adds some fire.
    But we will probably never know the full story to this either..we are still waiting four years later for the AIPAC trial to start.

    Reply

  7. Carroll says:

    I don’t know, a lot of us would favor the Sicilian approach, which as I understand it started as the people’s reaction to a s***** government…as long as we the people were using it against the politicans.
    BWTTGASO

    Reply

  8. farsighted says:

    Way to go Sandy! That cut & paste is soo long and soo off topic and I just want to say you should start your own blog. It would be great! You, Carroll and POA. It would be just fabulous! I would forgo reading Steve and spend all day reading you guys. Wow, I can’t wait.
    Best regards!

    Reply

  9. Sandy says:

    http://www.counterpunch.com/leupp01292008.html
    January 29, 2008
    A SIBEL EDMONDS TIMELINE
    “We Can’t Afford to Let Them Spill the Beans”
    By GARY LEUPP
    I am not one to easily embrace conspiracy theories, and in particular have found the idea that 9-11 was somehow an inside job too incredible for serious consideration. On the other hand, there are some very fishy aspects to some officials’ behavior pertaining to the attacks. Justin Raimondo has made a very good case for the fact that Mossad agents posing as “Israeli art students” were tracking al-Qaeda operatives in the U.S. before 9/11. Over 120 Israelis were detained after 9/11, some failing polygraph tests when asked about their involvement in intelligence gathering. But they were not held or charged with any illegal activity but rather deported. As former FBI translator and whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds has revealed, there was a curious failure of the government before 9/11 to act upon intelligence pertaining to an al-Qaeda attack. Most importantly Edmonds, defying the gag order that former Attorney General Ashcroft imposed on her in 2002, is implicating Marc Grossman, formerly the number three man in the State Department, in efforts to provide U.S. nuclear secrets to Pakistan and Israel. She suggests this was done through Turkish contacts and Pakistani contacts, including the former head of Pakistan’s ISI who funneled funds to Mohamed Atta! Now there’s a conspiracy for you.
    Edmonds claims that during her time at the FBI (September 20, 2001 to March 22, 2002) she discovered that intelligence material had been deliberately allowed to accumulate without translation; that inept translators were retained and promoted; and that evidence for traffic in nuclear materials was ignored. More shockingly, she charges that Grossman arranged for Turkish and Israeli Ph.D. students to acquire security clearances to Los Alamos and other nuclear facilities; and that nuclear secrets they acquired were transmitted to Pakistan and to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the “father of the Islamic bomb,” who in turn was selling nuclear technology to Libya and other nations. She links Grossman to the former Pakistani military intelligence chief Mahmoud Ahmad, a patron of the Taliban who reportedly arranged for a payment of $ 100,000 to 9/11 ringleader Atta via Pakistani terrorist Saeed Sheikh before the attacks. She suggests that he warned Pakistani and Turkish contacts against dealings with the Brewster Jennings Corp., the CIA front company that Valerie Plame was involved in as part of an effort to infiltrate a nuclear smuggling ring. All very heady stuff, published this month in the Times of London (and largely ignored by the U.S. media).
    She does not identify Grossman by name in the Times article, but she has in the past, and former CIA officer Philip Giraldi does so in an extremely interesting article in the American Conservative. From that and many other sources, I come up with the timeline that appears below. But first, some background on Grossman. A graduate of UC-Santa Barbara and the London School of Economics, he was a career Foreign Service officer from 1976 when he began to serve at the U.S. embassy in Pakistan. He continued in that post to 1983, when he became the Deputy Director of the Private Office of Lord Carrington, the Secretary General of NATO. From 1989 to 1992 he was Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Turkey, and from 1994 to 1997, U.S. Ambassador to Turkey. As ambassador he strongly supported massive arms deals between the U.S. and Ankara.
    Thereafter he was Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs, responsible for over 4,000 State Department employees posted in 50 sites abroad with a program budget of $1.2 billion to 2000. In 1999 he played a leading role in orchestrating NATO’s 50th anniversary Summit in Washington, and helped direct U.S. participation in NATO’s military campaign in Kosovo that same year. As Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs from the beginning of George W. Bush’s administration to January 2005, he played a bit role in the Plame Affair, informing “Scooter” Libby of Plame’s CIA affiliation.
    Grossman is close to the American Turkish Council (ATC) founded in 1994 as a sister organization to the American Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC). Its founders include neoconservatives involved in the Israel-Turkey relationship, including Richard Perle and Douglas Feith, as well as Henry Kissinger, Brent Snowcroft and former congressman Stephen Solarz. (Perle and Feith had earlier been registered lobbyists for Turkey through Feith’s company, International Advisors Inc. Parle was at one point making $ 600,000 per year from such activity). Edmonds says this is “an association in name and in charter only, the reality is that it and other affiliated associations are the U.S. government, lobbyists, foreign agents, and Military Industrial Complex.” (M. Christine Vick of Grossman’s Cohen Group serves on the Board of Advisors.) Grossman is also close to the American Turkish Association (ATA), and regularly speaks at its events.
    The both ATA and ATC have been targets of FBI investigations because of their suspected ties with drug smuggling, but Edmonds claims she heard wiretaps connecting ATC with other illegal activities, some related to 9/11. The CIA has investigated it in connection with the smuggling of nuclear secrets and material. Valerie Plame and the CIA front group Brewster Jennings were monitoring it when Bush administration officials leaked her identity in July 2003. Edmonds, Giraldi, and researchers Christopher Deliso and Luke Ryland accuse him of suspiciously enriching himself while in government service. Nevertheless he was awarded the Foreign Service’s highest rank when President Bush appointed him to the rank of Career Ambassador in 2004, and received Secretary of State’s Distinguished Service Award the following year.
    A dual Israeli-American national, Grossman has promoted the neocon agenda of forcing “regime change” in the Middle East. “[T]he time has come now,” he declared on the eve of the Iraq invasion, “to make a stand against this kind of connection between weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. And we think Iraq is a place to make that stand first the great threat today is the nexus between weapons of mass destruction and terrorism.” But he has not been as conspicuous a war advocate Wolfowitz, Perle, Feith, Libby, Bolton, and some others. (Perle and Feith, one should note, were also deeply involved in lobbying activities on behalf of Turkey as well as Israel in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Edelman was ambassador to Turkey 2003-05 where, chagrined by the Turkish failure to enthusiastically support the U.S. occupation of Iraq, he deeply offended his hosts.) Grossman seems less an ideologue driven to make the world safer for Israel than a corrupt, amoral, self-aggrandizing opportunist. Anyway, here is an incomplete chronology of his alleged wrongdoing, along with other relevant details.
    2001
    As newly appointed Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, Grossman assists Turkish, Israeli and other moles—mainly Ph.D. students—godfathering visa and arranging for security clearances to work in sensitive research facilities, including the Los Alamos nuclear laboratory in New Mexico. FBI taps his phone 2001-2, finds he is receiving bribes (one for $15,000). Edmonds states: “I heard at least three transactions like this over a period of 212 years. There are almost certainly more.”
    Between Aug. and Sept: Grossman warns his Turkish associates seeking to acquire nuclear secrets that Brewster Jennings (for whom CIA agent Valerie Plame works) is a CIA front.
    Sept. 4: Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad, the chief of Pakistan’s intelligence service (ISI) arrives in U.S., meets with Grossman and other U.S. officials.
    Sept. 10: Report by Amir Mateen in Pakistani newspaper Dawn (Karachi): “[Ahmad] also held long parleys with unspecified officials at the White House and the Pentagon. But the most important meeting was with Mark Grossman, US Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. US sources would not furnish any details beyond saying that the two discussed ‘matters of mutual interests.’”
    Sept. 11: Gen. Ahmad is having breakfast in Washington with Congressman Porter Goss (R-Fla.) and Senator Bob Graham (D) when attacks occur.
    (Goss had had 10 years in clandestine operations in CIA and later-Sept. 22, 2003-May 5, 2006—heads the organization. Graham and Goss later are the co-chairs of the joint House-Senate investigation that proclaimed there was “no smoking gun” as far as President George W. Bush having any advance knowledge of September 11.)
    Immediately after the 9/11 attacks, FBI arrests people suspected of being involved with the attacks–including four Turkish and Pakistani associates of key targets of FBI’s counterintelligence operations. Sibel heard the targets tell Grossman: “We need to get them out of the U.S. because we can’t afford for them to spill the beans.” Grossman facilitates their release from jail and suspects immediately leave U.S. without further investigation or interrogation.
    Sept. 12-13: Meetings between Ahmad and Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. Armitage threatens to bomb Pakistan “back to the Stone Age” unless it cooperates in U.S. attack on Afghanistan. Ahmad also meets Secretary of State Colin Powell. Agreement on Pakistan’s collaboration is secured.
    Sept. 20: Sibel Edmonds, a 32-year-old Turkish-American, hired as a translator by the FBI.
    According to Edmonds, she overheard an agent on a 2000 wiretap discussing with Saudi businessmen in Detroit “nuclear information that had been stolen from an air force base in Alabama,” and stating: “We have a package and we’re going to sell it for $250,000.” She also claims she listened to recordings of a high official (Grossman) receiving bribes from Turkish officials.
    Early October: Indian intelligence reports that Gen. Ahmad had in summer of 2001 ordered Saeed Sheikh (convicted of the kidnapping and killing of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl) to wire US$100,000 from Dubai to one of hijacker Mohamed Atta’s two bank accounts in Florida. FBI confirms story, reported on ABC news.
    Oct. 7: U.S.-led Coalition begins air strikes against Taliban.
    Oct. 8: Gen. Ahmad, Taliban supporter and an opponent of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, forced to retire from his post as director-general of ISI.
    Late Oct.: Pakistani government arrests three Pakistani nuclear scientists, all with close ties to Khan, for their suspected connections with the Taliban.
    2002
    Early March: Edmonds sends faxes to Sens. Chuck Grassley and Patrick Leahy on the Judiciary Committee, is called in for polygraph test; Department of Justice inspector general’s report states “she was not deceptive in her answers.”
    March: Grossman keynote speaker at ATC conference.
    March 22: Edmonds fired, allegedly for shoddy work, security breaches.
    Oct. 27: Edmonds appears on CBS’ “60 Minutes” program.
    Dec: Grossman visits Turkey, approves $3 billion U.S. aid to Turkey for the Iraq Cooperation deal.
    2003
    March 3: In interview for Dutch television, Grossman says, “”[T]he time has come now to make a stand against this kind of connection between weapons of mass destruction and terrorism. And we think Iraq is a place to make that stand first the great threat today is the nexus between weapons of mass destruction and terrorism.”
    May 29: Vice President Cheney’s chief of staff “Scooter” Libby asks Grossman for information about news report about the secret envoy sent by the CIA to Africa in 2002. Grossman requests a classified memo from Carl Ford, the director of the State Department’s intelligence bureau, and later orally briefs Libby on its contents.
    Mid-June: Powell and his deputy secretary Richard Armitage may have received a copy of the Grossman memo.
    June 10: Grossman asks the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) for a briefing on the Niger uranium issue, and specifically the State Department’s opposition to the continuing White House view that Iraq had tried to buy yellow cake. The resulting memo is dated the same day, and drawn from notes on the February 19 meeting at the CIA on the Wilson mission and other sources. Memo is classified “Top Secret,” and contains in one paragraph, separately marked ‘(S/NF)” for “Secret/No dissemination to foreign governments or intelligence agencies, ” two sentences describing in passing Valerie “Wilson’s” identity as a CIA operative and her role in the inception of the Wilson trip to Niger. This June 10 memo reportedly does not use her maiden name Plame.
    June 17-July 9: Senate Judiciary Committee holds unclassified hearings on Edmonds’ allegations.
    June 19: letter from Senior Republican Senator, Charles Grassley, and Senior Democrat Senator, Patrick Leahy to Inspector General Glenn A. Fine concerning Edmonds’ allegations.
    July 14: Robert Novak reveals Plame’s CIA identity.
    July 22: Edmonds files suit against the Department of Justice, the FBI, and several high-level officials, alleging that she was wrongfully terminated from the FBI in retaliation for reporting criminal activities committed by government employees.
    Aug. 13: letter from two senators to Attorney General Ashcroft concerning Sibel Edmonds’ allegations.
    Aug. 15: 600 victims of the 9/11 attacks file suit (Burnett v. Al Baraka Investment & Dev. Corp.), request from Edmonds deposition providing evidence for U.S. government foreknowledge of 9-11 attacks.
    Sept. 22: Goss made CIA Director (resigns May 5, 2006).
    Oct. 18, 2002: Attorney General John Ashcroft invokes the State Secrets Privilege (requested not by Justice Department but by State department) in order to prevent disclosure of the nature of Edmonds’ work on the grounds that it would endanger national security, and asked that her wrongful termination suit be dismissed. In effect places Edmonds under a gag order.
    Congressman Henry Waxman (D-Ca.) expresses outrage at gag order, promises that a Democratic majority in Congress would conduct hearings. (This has not been done.)
    Oct. 28: Letter from two senators to FBI Director Robert Mueller concerning Sibel Edmonds’ allegations.
    Dec. 11, Attorney General Ashcroft again invoking the State Secrets Privilege, files a motion calling for Edmonds’ deposition in Burnett v. Al Baraka case be suppressed and for the entire case to be dismissed. The judge, seeking more information, orders government to produce any unclassified material relating to the case. In response, Ashcroft submits further statements to justify the use of the State Secrets Privilege.
    Dec: Gross back in Turkey to approve Turkey’s eligibility to participate in tenders for Iraq’s reconstruction.
    2004
    Grossman achieves Foreign Service’s highest rank when President Bush appoints him to rank of Career Ambassador.
    Patrick Leahy calls for investigation; Sen. Orrin Hatch, Republican Chairman of the Senate, blocks it.
    May 13: Ashcroft retroactively classifies all material that had been provided to Senate Judiciary Committee in 2000 relating to Edmond’s lawsuit, as well as the senators’ letters that had already been posted on line by the Project on Government Oversight (POGO).
    June 23: POGO files lawsuit against Justice Department for classifying material it had published; Justice Department fails to get the case dismissed.
    July 6: Edmonds suit dismissed on state secrets grounds.
    July : Edmonds files appeal. On same day, Inspector General releases unclassified summary of a highly classified report on an investigation that had concluded “that many of her allegations were supported, that the FBI did not take them seriously enough, and that her allegations were, in fact, the most significant factor in the FBI’s decision to terminate her services. Rather than investigate Edmonds’ allegations vigorously and thoroughly, the FBI concluded that she was a disruption and terminated her contract.”
    August: Edmonds founds the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC) to address U.S. security weaknesses.
    December: Grossman the key speaker at an ATC Conference held at the Omni Shoreham Hotel.
    2005
    Grossman receives Secretary of State’s Distinguished Service Award.
    January: Grossman quits his government job. Eric Edelman, another former ambassador to Turkey, takes job of Under Secretary of Defence for Policy.
    January: Pakistani nuclear engineer A. Q. Khan confesses to having been involved in a clandestine international network of nuclear weapons technology proliferation from Pakistan to Libya, Iran and North Korea.
    Feb. 5: Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf announces he has pardoned Khan. U.S. response is mild.
    March: Grossman made vice-chairman of Cohen Group.
    Feb. 18: Justice Department under new attorney general backs away from claim that documents posted by POGO were classified.
    April 21: In the hours before the hearing of her appeal, three judges issued a ruling that barred all reporters and the public from the courtroom. During the proceedings, Edmonds was not allowed into the courtroom for the hearing.
    May 6: Edmonds’ case dismissed, no reason provided, no opinion cited.
    May 14: In open letter, Edmonds states the governments wants to silence here to “protect certain diplomatic relations” and to “protect certain U.S. foreign business relations.” Says the “foreign relations” mentioned in the gag order “are not in the interest of, or of benefit to, the majority of Americans, but instead serve and protect a small minority.”
    June 20: Edmonds writes: “(In) April 2001, a long-term FBI informant/asset who had been providing the bureau with information since 1990, provided two FBI agents and a translator with specific information regarding a terrorist attack being planned by Osama Bin Laden. For almost four years since September 11, officials refused to admit to having specific information regarding the terrorists’ plans to attack the United States. The Phoenix Memo, received months prior to the 9/11 attacks, specifically warned FBI HQ of pilot training and their possible link to terrorist activities against the US. Four months prior to the terrorist attacks the Iranian asset provided the FBI with specific information regarding the ‘use of airplanes’, ‘major US cities as targets’, and ‘Osama Bin Laden issuing the order.’ Coleen Rowley likewise reported that specific information had been provided to FBI HQ.”
    July 20: Unidentified as a “retired state department official” Grossman tells AP that a classified State Department memo disputed the legitimacy of administration claims that Iraq sought to acquire uranium from Niger, also contained a few lines about Plame Wilson’s CIA employment, marked as secret.
    August 5: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) petitioned for the Supreme Court of the United States to review the lower courts’ application of the State Secret Privilege in both lawsuits. The ACLU claims that the courts conflated the State Secrets Privilege and the Totten rule.
    Sept. 28: Washington Post cites unnamed former administration source (Grossman) as stating that the outing of Plame was “Clearly..meant purely and simply for revenge.
    Oct. 28: In Patrick Fitzgerald’s indictment of I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Grossman is the Under Secretary of State mentioned as giving information about Plame to Libby.
    Nov.: Grossman attends lavish Turkish Ottoman Dinner Gala, receives award from Turkish lobby group, the Assembly of American Turkish Association (ATAA) in Chicago.
    Nov. 28: the Supreme Court declined to review the decisions made in the Edmonds case.
    2006
    March: Grossman the key speaker at the ATC annual conference.
    June: Grossman key speaker at MERIA Conference, discussing Turkey’s importance to U.S. and Israel.
    Sept. 2006: a documentary about Sibel Edmonds’ case called Kill The Messenger (“Une Femme à Abattre”) premiers in France
    2007
    January 24: Grossman first to testify in Libby trial. Says he informed Libby of Plame’s involvement “in about 30 seconds of conversation” in June 2003.
    Nov: Grossman subpoenaed by defense in AIPAC trial.
    Nov. 26: Grossman, now Vice Chairman of the consulting firm the Cohen Group, attends a major Security Conference in Riga, Latvia.
    2008
    January: Edmonds posts, without comment, photos of current and former officials and Turkish associates on website: Richard Perle, Eric Edelman, Marc Grossman, Brent Snowcroft, Larry Franklin, Ex-House Speaker Dennis Hastert, Roy Blunt (R-Mo), Dan Burton (R-Ind.), Tom Lantos (D-Ca.), Bob Livingston (ex-House Speaker, R-La.), Stephen Solarz (D-NY), Graham Fulle (RAND), David Makovsky (WINEP), Martin Markovsky (WINEP), Yusuf Turani (president in exile of Turkmenistan), Prof. Sabri Sayari (Columbia University, WINEP), Mehmet Eymur (former head of Turkish counter-terrorism).
    Jan. 6: Times of London carries story, “For sale: West’s deadly nuclear secrets.” States that a high official “was aiding foreign operatives against US interests by passing them highly classified information, not only from the State Department but also from the Pentagon, in exchange for money, position and political objectives.” Claims that the FBI was also gathering evidence against senior Pentagon officials–including household names–who were aiding foreign agents.
    “If you made public all the information that the FBI have on this case, you will see very high-level people going through criminal trials.”
    Jan. 22: White House issues statement declaring its intention to approve sale of nuclear secrets to Turkey; Joshua Franks writes, “It appears the White House has been spooked by Edmonds and hopes to absolve the U.S. officials allegedly involved in the illegal sale of nuclear technology to private Turkish ‘entities’.” Frank identifies Grossman as one of these officials.
    * * * * *
    Edmonds is tirelessly and fearlessly campaigning for Congressman Waxman, now chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, to hold hearings. She says that FBI agents and even former Turkish intelligence officials are willing and able to validate her charges. But the congressman hesitates, perhaps fearing the storm of indignation that explosive evidence will produce in a country sick of its politicians, the lying neocons, and the war. Should they discover that, while disseminating disinformation about foreign nukes in order to fearmonger and build support for aggressive war, some of these officials were actually peddling nuclear secrets-committing treason while receiving honors for their patriotic service—the response could be explosive.
    The Office of Special Plans under Abram Shulsky and Douglas Feith cherry-picked the intelligence vetted through the New York Times to terrify people into supporting an attack on Iraq. Democratic leaders have in the past urged an investigation of that spooky office, but furnished the opportunity since November 2006, they have declined to hold hearings. The Italian parliament conducted a study of the Niger uranium hoax, fingering neocon Michael Ledeen as a key suspect in forging documents designed to provide a casus belli before the Iran attack. Congress does nothing to follow up. In effect they are saying that the administration has a right to lie to the people. The presidential pardon granted Libby is a clear statement that it’s okay to punish whistle-blowers like Joseph Wilson. The Supreme Court refuses to hear Edmonds’ appeal. It seems that all three branches of government compete to coddle the most unscrupulous and lawless officials, while marginalizing or punishing honest citizens who expose the rot.
    The publication of the National Intelligence Estimate undercutting the administration’s case for attacking Iran indicates that there are in the U.S. intelligence community persons alarmed by the administration’s lies and efforts to justify more aggression based on lies. It enrages the neocons, who with Norman Podhoretz in the lead have been praying for Bush to bomb Iran. The arrest and conviction of Feith subordinate Larry Franklin shows that within the FBI there are forces disturbed at the close connections between the neocons, Israeli intelligence, and the Israel lobby and willing to take action against lawbreaking. But Feith and Perle have both been investigated before, Perle for discussing classified information with Israeli Embassy staff in an FBI-monitored phone call in Washington in 1970. But the cases dropped for apparent political reasons. Perhaps the Grossman story will gain some traction. Maybe it will prove egregious enough that the tide will turn. Maybe Bush’s last year of office will see the neocons’ thorough exposure, humiliation and defeat.
    Or maybe Waxman, Rep. Conyers and others in positions to honestly confront this most mendacious of administrations will continue to dither, feeding the assumption of the most vicious, cynical and corrupt that they are indeed above the law. And earning the contempt of those naïve enough to expect serious congressional oversight of a rogue regime.
    Gary Leupp is Professor of History at Tufts University, and Adjunct Professor of Comparative Religion.
    He can be reached at: gleupp@granite.tufts.edu

    Reply

  10. 007 says:

    Well guess what? The most thuggish behavior on the Democratic side is NOT coming from where these previous commentators think it is. But here is the real point. Each campaign will need each other’s supporters in order to GOVERN. There is no one candidate, at least on the Democratic side, that is capable of governing with one set of supporters. Everyone better sign up to the victor’s new goverment–or the new Democratic President will be serving one term. Count on it. Governing is going to be far harder than any candicate can possibly imagine–especially after this president.
    007
    007

    Reply

  11. Lurker says:

    This whole idea that the Democrats and Republicans are significantly different is so far past absurd…
    Not a DIME’S WORTH OF DIFFERENCE between the Republithugs and that Dimbocraps, as evidenced by last night *State of the Union* when Nancy Sleaze-osi stood up and clapped when she should have been handcuffing Darth Cheney and that Smirking Dimbulb.
    But let me give two quotes that elaborate on the fact that thugs run and profit from both parties, both quotes from people vastly more intelligent than I am (hat tip to posters at http://www.antiwar.com for providing these quotes)
    The following quote by H.L. Mencken:
    “Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule — and both commonly succeed, and are right… The United States has never developed an aristocracy really disinterested or an intelligentsia really intelligent. Its history is simply a record of vacillations between two gangs of frauds.”
    “Friedrich Engels’ astute observation of the American 2-party system back in 1891:
    “We find here in the United States two great gangs of political speculators, who alternately take possession of the state power and exploit it by the most corrupt means and for the most corrupt ends—and the nation is powerless against those two great cartels of politicians, who are ostensibly its servants, but in reality dominate and plunder it.”
    America, or as Dubya puts it, “Mur-cur”
    R.I.P.

    Reply

  12. judyo says:

    It’s exactly the America we live in. Study Atwater and Rove. Base/thuggish behavior is a trickle down success story.

    Reply

  13. Kathleen says:

    Excuse me, but what about this approach to politics makes it necessarilly “Sicilian”?
    I consder this an ethnic slur. Bush is heavy on the loyalty issue..one cannot even attend one of his events without signing a loyaLy oath and suffering retalitaion, if one strays even minimally. He isn’t Sicilian.
    Why not describe this strict loyalty requirement as the Orthodox Jewish approach? Dosn’t an Orthodox Jewish family sit shivva and pronounce a person dead to them if they stray from their predetermined straight and narrow? And then we have all the WASPS Gentlemen’s Agreements and the Ku Klux Klan type loyalty requirements.
    One would think Sicilians had a monopoly on loyalty requirements. Where did you get your perception of Sicilians, Steve, a cheap Hollywood Gangsta movie? To define a whole culture by only its criminal element is biased, inaccurate snd defamatory.
    All of the operatives in every one of those political camps is “Un-Sicilian” because they aren’t capable of genuine loyalty or even honorable conduct. They cheat and lie and betray each other. Worst of all they brag and boast and overstate their abilities, something a Sicilian couldn’t tolerate. Braggadoccio. Not. Sicilians are allergic to bullshit.
    Sicilians are Un-American”, is that what you are saying? I’m offended. Speaking of Sicilian approaches in politics, you could not find a finer example of honorbale execution of public duty in office than that of the late Governor Ella T. Grasso, D. CT. She was the first woman elected to the office on her own, not as the widow of a late Governor. She was fair, modest, and quietly competent. We would be far better off today, if politics was conducted like Governor Grasso did. The gov’t would still enjoy the public trust. It doesn’t now with all the Non-Sicilians in office.

    Reply

  14. Rob says:

    Selecting one of the houses of Congress like we do juries. That’s, excusing the French, a fairly dumb idea. We would be better off selecting by lot, or eliminate the first constitutional treason by returning to one representative per 30,000 voters under Article 1-Section 3, and repeal the 17th amendment and return to having Senators appointed by State legislators. The first will restore democracy in America and the last will restore the the 10th amendment (States Rights).
    I don’t believe in meddling with political dialog or debate in any form. As it is there is enough unconstitutional regulation by the Federal government over what constitutes political speech in this country. We are also still trying to iron out the democracy killing provisions of the last campaign finance reform act of McCain/Feingold fame. Leave the candidates unchained & unencumbered in the speech department, and the many media formats that exist today will report on their antics, perversions and substance, if any, of what they do, say and stand for.

    Reply

  15. Sandy says:

    Romney and Huckleberry….eh….Huckabee?
    BWTTGASO

    Reply

  16. Jeff says:

    I’m having a hard time understanding this sentence:
    On the Republican side, I’ve been told by some helping one of the two governors that McCain’s team has offered threats that are staggering and at one level, hard to believe — but I know in at least one case, it happened.
    Is there a word missing here? Which one of two governors? Are we talking about Pawlenty and Crist, or what? And who threatened whom? I’m sorry if this is my poor reading comprehension skills, but I can’t make sense of what’s being asserted.

    Reply

  17. anatol says:

    Linda,
    I’m sure that just as legions of Obama’s supporters you’re projecting the goodness of your soul on a politician who is every bit as skilled in dirty tricks as anyone in this election. Steve, please correct me if I’m wrong, but I think you (rightly IMHO) condemned ALL Dem campaigns (how many are there?).
    As I said elsewhere, Obama’s dirty tricks are slightly more offputting to me because he plays such an uplifting, idealist prophet of a new dawn, and the media lets him get away with that. (For the same reason McCain’s lies and flip-flops irate me more than those of his competitors)

    Reply

  18. JohnH says:

    After 7 years of Bush’s War on Dissent, it’s about time people started saying that “no one should be threatened or penalized or brow-beaten or harassed to support one candidate over another.” Unfortunately the “Sicilian approach” is as American as apple pie.
    IMHO the problem is that politics often attracts losers whose whole self esteem is wrapped up in whether they win or not. If they win, they are loved. If they lose, nobody likes them. My brief foray into party politics ended when I noticed that the party pro’s, defeated in that year’s elections, spent most of their evenings drowning their sorrows in drink, losers in all senses.
    It’s why I think that at least one house of every legislature should be selected like juries. You put aside all the self-esteem and related fund raising problems. Those who serve would be free to focus on the issues at hand. And the caliber of those selected probably wouldn’t suffer, especially considering those who “serve” us now.

    Reply

  19. Odeon says:

    “you are with us or you are against us;” “if you help X, then you are dead to us. . .you are nothing;” “you will get no job — no breaks whatsoever if you help X.”
    Well, well, well, after what has unfolded within the past week, I wonder which campaign amongst the Dems could be saying something like ?
    Hint: The “X” in those quotes are blatant attempts to equate their foe with Malcolm X !

    Reply

  20. Linda says:

    One of the main reasons I support Obama is that I do think we need a better way of dealing with free speech, dissent, and disagreement at all levels of society. Obama was taught constitutional law by Layrence Tribe who also is supporting him, and Obama also taught constitutional law at University of Chicago Law School. The First Amendment is important as well as civility in respecting that most important of our rights.
    It’s not just the things you mentioned, Steve, but also Senators having to recant when they mention some practices of ours as resembling Nazi Germany–and forgetting that Hitler came to power by silencing dissenters. And then it goes all the way down to how rudely some people treat other commenters on this blog.
    The President has a bully pulpit and can speak about such things and calm the waters. I can’t see Clinton, Romney, or McCain doing that. And that is what this country desperately needs to heal and get back to being what we all want USA to be.

    Reply

  21. Steve Clemons says:

    SF – I think your complaints are valid. I think that non-mainstream positions should not be harassed either. Best, Steve Clemons

    Reply

  22. Skulz Fontaine says:

    Some of us have been “threatened, penalized, brow-beaten, and harassed” for supporting a “different” position than the mainstream. Is that intimidation “Sicilian?” Or would it just be the marginalizing of dissent? One does get used to the slings and arrows of vicious choice. Those slings and arrows still hurt like hell but one does get used to it. Whatcha think Steve? Any difference?

    Reply

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *